Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />mental groups, national taxpayer organizations and <br />wildlife agencies over long-term impacts, caused <br />further delays, <br /> <br />Sacramento area flood leaders have twice selected <br />a flood detention dam upstream of Folsom to <br />protect the Sacramento area from flooding, Other <br />proposals included a downstream plan involving <br />Folsom Dam, reservoir modifications and down- <br />stream levee improvements. However, Congress <br />has rejected the dam, instead authorizing $44 <br />million to fund the "common elements" of the <br />alternative plans, which includes fixing down, <br />stream levees. In 1998, Sacramento area officials <br />were once again considering which flood control <br />plan to forward to Congress for possible funding, In <br />addition to Auburn Dam, the other options were to <br />modify Folsom Dam's outlets so it can release <br />more water earlier in a storm or to combine dam <br />modifications with raising and strengthening down- <br />stream levees. <br /> <br />In southern California, a study was conducted on <br />the adequacy of Los Angeles County's flood control, <br />which is estimated to provide between 25 to 40 <br />year level of protection. The report released in 1991 <br />by the county Department of Public Works (DPW) <br />incorporated input from local and environmental <br />organizations to increase water conservation, <br />environmental and recreation resources. Projects <br />have been initiated to enhance wildlife habitat and <br />recreational opportunities, including the establish. <br /> <br />"" <br /> <br />~;. <br />_~7~.~ <br />'1 <br /> <br />- <br />"",-_... ~ <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />...-,..... <br /> <br />ment of a green belt along the river, which has <br />been extensively channelized with concrete. There <br />is an ongoing controversy between DPW and the <br />Corps and environmental groups over how to <br />increase flood protection along the Los Angeles <br />and San Gabriel river systems, The public agencies <br />are pushing for higher levee walls, whereas <br />environmentalists advocate watershed management <br />measures, including widespread concrete removal, <br />dry wells, cisterns, mulching to increase the <br />absorption of the compacted land along the river <br />banks and tree planting. <br /> <br />The concept of "greening" the banks with riparian <br />vegetation is gaining support. Proponents of green- <br />ing the river banks believe that concrete channels <br />increase downstream flooding. Concrete channels <br />and small tributaries to the river route the runoff into <br />the main riverbed simultaneously. Advocates of <br />greening are encouraging water managers to look <br />at the desirability of allowing runoff to flow more <br />slowly along natural, ragged banks, and by trapping <br />it in basins so it can percolate and restore ground- <br />water supplies. <br /> <br />Other future flood control projects statewide include <br />a flood containment and environmental restoration <br />of Redwood Creek in Humboldt County; an increase <br />in the channel capacity of the Guadalupe River to <br />increase protection for the city of San Jose; and <br />possible improvements for flood control in the <br />Whitewater River Basin near Palm Springs, <br /> <br />Fulsom Dam releas;"x <br />j/ood j/ows, <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />0::0 <br /> <br />~... <br /> <br />~" <br /> <br />'.~ <br />..... <br />.0:: <br />~.. <br /> <br />~ <br />,." ~~r:"l <br />~ ,.. <br />~oor. <br />-, ,J. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />.... <br /> <br />.~ <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />~ <br />