Laserfiche WebLink
<br />reliability evaluation." Critics of indirect potable reuse <br />have focused on language in the report identifying <br />indirect potable reuse as, "an option of last resort," <br />to be used only when olher options are, "technically <br />or economically infeasible." <br /> <br /> <br />INDIRECT POTABLE REUSE <br /> <br />How recycled water is used determines the level of <br />treatment. The greater the potential for human <br />contact, the stricter the criteria. For water to be fit for <br />human consumption, it must meet stringent state and <br />federal standards. <br /> <br />Since 1962, WRD has been using recycled water to <br />recharge overdrafted underground basins that serve <br />as a potable supply for residential areas in the Los <br />Angeles area. The district spreads the water above <br />deep aquifers and as the treated water percolates <br />through the soil, it is <br />further filtered. Since the <br />mid-1990s, approximately <br />50,000 acre-feet of re- <br />cycled water has been <br />spread annually, making <br />WRD the largest regu- <br />lated reclaimed water <br />user in the state. Eventu- <br />ally, WRD plans to recycle <br />more Ihan 100,000 acre- <br />feet of water per year. <br /> <br /> <br />According to a 1984 <br />health effects study con- <br />ducted by the Los Ange- <br />les County Sanitation Districts and the UCLA School <br />of Public Health of WRD's groundwater replenish- <br />ment project at Whittier Narrows (affecting 900,000 <br />people), no detectable impact on human health was <br />found. A 1991 update of the study by the RAND <br />Corporation supported the 1984 findings and found, <br />"rates of cancer, mortality, and infectious disease <br />were similar in bolh the area of Los Angeles County <br />receiving some reclaimed water and a control area <br />not receiving reclaimed water." <br /> <br />Mixing advanced treated recycled water into drink- <br />ing water supplies - indirect potable reuse - has <br />raised some health concerns about unknown patho- <br />gens (particularly viruses) or unidentified chemical <br />constituents because of their small size. A national <br />report assessing possible health implications of <br />indirect potable reuse of recycled water to augment <br />drinking water sources was completed in 1998. The <br />report, Issues in Potable Reuse: The Viability 01 <br />Augmenting Drinking Water Supplies Wilh Reclaimed <br />Water, by the National Research Council, concluded <br />that, "planned, indirect potable reuse may be <br />practicable where there is a careful, thorough, <br />project-specific assessment, including contaminant <br />monitoring, health and safety testing and syslem <br /> <br />In essence, the report admits the limitations of <br />current water testing and standards and as a result, <br />does not attempt to compare recycled water quality <br />with a similar potable water source. The report states <br />that federal SDWA standards are aimed at water <br />obtained from conventional, <br />relatively uncontaminated <br />sources of water and were not <br />intended to apply to recycled <br />water. The report calls for in- <br />direct potable reuse standards <br />to be more stringent than <br />those applied 10 convenlional <br />drinking water supplies. It <br />adds that although the epide- <br />miological and toxicological <br />data on Ihe health risks of <br />microbial pathogens or un- <br />known chemical mixtures in <br />recycled water suggest that <br />advance treated water is safe, <br />the information is sparse and insufficient. The report <br />acknowledges, however, that similar concerns exist <br />over the current testing of potable water from <br />conventional waler sources and that given the best <br />current information available, "these uncertainties <br />are not adequate reason for rejecling indirect <br />potable reuse." <br /> <br />., <br /> <br />Further exploration into whether or not indirect <br />potable use meets SDWA standards also was made <br />by DHS and DWR in a 1996 guidance document <br />entitled Indirect Potable Reuse 01 Advanced Treated <br />Reclaimed Water by Surface Water Augmentation <br />in California. This framework on using treated water <br />to increase potable supplies recommends several <br />criteria be met before allowing indirect potable use <br />of recycled water for sutiace water augmentation. <br />The recommendations include using the best <br />available technology in an advanced wastewater <br />treatment plant such as membranes and ozone; <br />meeting drinking water standards; carefully monitor- <br />ing the project; and ensuring "appropriate retention <br />time" for the repurified water in a reservoir in order <br />to respond to any treatment failures before treating <br />it one more time in a drinking water treatment plant <br />and blending it with the existing supply. <br /> <br />9 <br />