My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00121
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00121
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2010 3:55:22 PM
Creation date
9/30/2006 10:20:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
1983
Title
Construction Fund Annual Report 1983
CWCB Section
Finance
Author
CWCB
Description
Construction Fund Annual Report 1983
Publications - Doc Type
CF Annual Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />,. <br /> <br />projects before final jungments as to their feasibility can be . <br />rendered. Finally, the Grand Mesa project will have to apply to . <br />the Federal Energy Requlatory Commission (FERC) for a preliminary <br />permit prior to being licensed. Once a permit is issued, a 24 or <br />36 months period is provided for the studies to be conducted upon <br />which a license request is based and forwarded to FERC. <br /> <br />project layout and cost estimates could be significantly <br />impacted by these yet to be performed analyses, thereby affecting <br />project feasibility. Furthermore, neither of these projects has <br />yet been studied to the level of detail required in the past <br />before the Board acted to recommend a project for authorization. <br /> <br />Under the circumstances, it may be appropriate to defer a <br />Board decision on authorization until further analyses are <br />completed so that the cost and feasibility of each project can be <br />judged with a higher degree of confidence. If this is done, the <br />Board should financially participate in the needed remaining <br />studies. This, in turn, will raise issues concerning the amount <br />of Board participation (both in terms of dollar amount and <br />percentage participation), since the required evaluations will <br />cost several hundreds of thousands of dollars. Such expensive <br />studies usually exceed the financial capabilities of local <br />sponsoring entities. <br /> <br />The financing issues to be addressed are two fold: (1) <br />outright requests for grants (Buckeye Reservoir) and (2) projects <br />for which Board financing may ultimately prove to be grants if <br />future demands for the total yield of the project (and thus the <br />associated revenues) do not develop. The range of potential <br />responses to the latter circumstance is outlined in my September <br />30 me~o. Also, a table showing the estimated cost of the <br />projects under consideration is enclosed. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />JWM/gI <br /> <br />Enclosures: as stated (2) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />-2- <br /> <br />11/18/82 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.