My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00118
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00118
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2010 8:58:17 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 10:19:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2000
Title
Arkansas River Water Needs Assessment
CWCB Section
Interstate & Federal
Author
Smith and Hill
Description
Information and findings associated with the Arkansas River Water Needs Assessment study
Publications - Doc Type
Historical
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
371
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Arkansas River Water Needs Assessment - Section 1. Executive Summary <br /> <br />ranging from 300 cfs to 500 cfs. The riparian <br />community is dormant during this time, and very <br />little boating occurs. Since 1990, BOR has <br />typically transferred water from the upper reser- <br />voirs to Pueblo Reservoir during this time period. <br />These releases have seldom created a situation in <br />which reservoir releases caused total flows to <br />exceed 500 cfs. Winter releases have also made it <br />possible to meet flow targets for supporting fishery <br />values after April 15 because a significant volume <br />of water has already been transported to Pueblo <br />Reservoir. <br /> <br />Snowmelt Runoff Period (typically April 15- <br />July 15) - Higher flows experienced during this <br />period are not optimal for the fish population or <br />for angling, but spring runoff is an uncontrolled, <br />natural function of rivers. Resource managers <br />recognize that there must be a window to pass <br />significant quantities of water. Conversely, the <br />annual runoff periods usually provide flows that <br />satisfY needs for recreational boating. The vari- <br />ability of the annual high flow events also provides <br />river channel maintenance, habitat maintenance, <br />and habirat creation functions that are critical for <br />riparian and wildlife values. BOR attempts to <br />avoid Project water releases during this time <br />because the channel below Twin Lakes Dam has a <br />limited capacity that is usually already filled with <br />runoff water. <br /> <br />End of Snowmelt Runoff (typically July 15) to <br />Labor Day - During this period, there is a signifi- <br />cant difference in flow needs to support fish popu- <br />lations and recreational values. The fish popula- <br />tion prefers flows from 300 to 500 cfs. Rafters <br />prefer flows of 1,500 to 2,000 cfs, while kayakers <br />prefer flows of 1,300 to 1,500 cfs. Float <br />fishermen prefer flows of 900 to 1,200 cfs, spin <br />fishermen prefer flows of 700 ro 1,200 cfs, and fly <br />fishermen prefer flows of 400 to 500 cfs. If the <br />annual flow management program were not in <br />place, BOR would not release water during this <br />period to avoid unnecessarily storing water in <br /> <br />Pueblo Reservoir. Water unnecessarily stored in <br />Pueblo Reservoir increases the risk of spilling <br />winter water, slighdy increases the evaporation loss <br />of Project water, and may advetsely impact <br />flatwater recreation at the upper reservoirs. <br /> <br />Labor Day-October 31 - Resource needs are <br />similar during this period. Fish population and <br />angling needs are well-supported by flows from <br />300 to 500 cfs, as is the riparian zone at the end <br />of its growing season. While boating use would <br />be betrer supported by flows of at least 1,000 cfs, <br />the demand for such use declines sharply after <br />Labor Day weekend. If the annual flow manage- <br />ment program were not in place, BOR would not <br />make water releases during this period for the <br />same reasons cited in the discussion for the July 15 <br />to Labor Day period. <br /> <br />Comparison of Natural Resource <br />Flow Preferences to Baseline <br />Arkansas River Flows <br /> <br />When evaluating the effect of various flows on <br />natural resource values, it is important to under- <br />stand how well baseline Arkansas River flows have <br />supported natural resource values. During some <br />periods of the year, baseline Arkansas River flows <br />are substantially different than the preferred flows <br />for many resource values. To facilitate a compar- <br />ison between baseline Arkansas River flows and <br />resource needs, the following hydro graphs were <br />developed to illustrate flows during the 1982 to <br />1994 period, when the Ftyingpan-Arkansas <br />Project was in full operation. Please note that <br />flows released to fulfill the objectives of the annual <br />flow management program have been subtracted <br />from these hydrographs whenever a separate <br />accounting of these releases was recorded. This <br />means that summer flow augmentation releases <br />have been subtracted out of the hydrographs,rwhile releases during fall, winter, and spring under <br />the annual flow management program have not <br />been subtracted out of the hydrographs. <br /> <br />1-12 - Water Needed to Protect or Promote Critical Resource Values <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.