Laserfiche WebLink
<br />rization, the debate has focused on the costs of regu- <br />lations on business and the federal costs of helping <br />states pay for non point source pollution controls. EPA <br />had hoped to use the reauthorization process to <br />bolster the effort to curb polluted runoff, but so tar <br />that hasn't happened. <br /> <br />THE AUTHORITIES <br /> <br />The amalgam of federal and state laws relies on <br />cooperation among government agencies tor <br />implementation. While the CWA grants authority to <br />EPA, most of the implementation is conducted by <br />individual states. EPA monitors the state efforts, <br />provides funding and guidance, and steps in when it <br />believes the federal law is not being met. <br /> <br />In California, the authority rests with the State Board, <br />which also is charged under California's Porter- <br />Cologne with its own authority to set statewide water <br />policies and protect water quality. State law also <br /> <br />SACRAMENTO RIVER <br /> <br />The state's largest river is a case study in water <br />quality problems. The Sacramento River water- <br />shed gathers runoff from the Coast Range, south- <br />ern Cascades and northern Sierra Nevada, and <br />the broad alluvial valley that has formed between <br />the three ranges, before flowing into the largest <br />estuary on the West Coast. <br /> <br />Along mosf of that way, the river has been <br />physically transformed, The river and most of <br />its tributaries have been dammed, most of the <br />channel has been constrained by levees, most <br />of the marshes have been diked and drained, <br />most of the streamside forests have been cut. <br />The physical changes have degraded water <br />quality: the dams and denuded banks result in <br />periodically warmer flows. The levees acceler- <br />ate the flow and the erosion, and sediment is <br />captured by dams or held in the main channel. <br /> <br />In addition, the river carries away waste from old <br />mines, expansive farms and growing cities. Until <br />recently, Iron Mountain Mine near Redding was <br />the largest polluter of ifs kind in the nation, feed- <br />ing tons of copper, zinc and other metals into the <br />river. Most of the copper, zinc and cadmium in <br />the river come from Iron Mountain Mine and other <br />inactive mines. <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br />created nine regional water quality control boards. <br />The boundaries of the regional boards are defined <br />by the major watersheds 01 the state: the North <br />Coast, San Francisco Bay, the Central Coast, Los <br />Angeles, the Central Valley, the Lahontan Region of <br />the eastern Sierra Nevada, the Colorado River basin, <br />Santa Ana and San Diego. The regional boards set <br />regional water quality standards, issue and enforce <br />the terms of permits, monitor pollution control efforts <br />and implement nonpoint source pollution programs. <br /> <br /> <br />In the case of polluted runoff, much of fhe action is <br />required of local planning agencies that authorize <br />development of private land and provide public <br />infrastructure. Federal and state agencies that <br />control public lands or regulate resource management <br />on private land - such as the U.S. Forest Service <br />and the California Department of Forestry and Fire <br />Protection - also are obligated to control polluted <br />runoff. As with all public policies, ultimate authority <br />rests with the public. In the spring of 1994, a Times <br />Mirror Poll found 76 percent of Americans do not <br />believe water pollution laws have gone far enough. <br /> <br />Farm runoff from agricultural drains has tested <br />toxic to fish and the smaller creatures tI1ey feed on. <br />Winter rains wash pesticides from orchards and <br />summer irrigation runoff muddies the river with sedi- <br />ment and organic matter. While cities and industrial <br />users have treatment works and pollution penmits, <br />carelessness has led to permit violations in the Sac- <br />ramento metropolitan area. The rapidly expanding <br />cities also are creating more runoff - adding petro- <br />leum products, litter, garden pestiCides and other <br />household chemicals to tI1e mix. <br /> <br />The river has experienced some successes. <br />Dioxin discharged from a paper mill near Redding <br />and responsible for contaminating a prized trout <br />fishery has been greatly reduced, At Shasta Dam, <br />a temperature control device is being installed <br />that will help keep downstream water cool for fish <br />during key spawning periods. After being pres- <br />sured by downstream water users, state officials <br />have required rice farmers to reduce herbicide <br />discharges to the river, and a federal clean up <br />plan at Iron Mountain Mine is being implemented. <br />But more peopte are working to yield a more <br />diversified harvest from the valley - in agricul- <br />ture and industry - leading to efforts to devise a <br />watershed management strategy to protect the <br />river from increasing development pressures. <br />