Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Step 2 - Formulation of Water Resource Development Alternatives <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />1-6 <br /> <br />Step 2 of the Study began in October 1984 with the completion of a <br />revised Plan of Study. Revisions were made in recognition of the revised <br />Study scope which resulted from input from the publ ic and from the Study <br />Advisors. As indicated in Table 1-2, 13 specific tasks including the Final <br />Report were completed for Step 2. <br /> <br />The main emphasis of Step 2 was to formulate and evaluate up to six <br />alternative water resource management plans. An important part of plan formu- <br />lation was the need to identify and evaluate plan elements. Plan elements are <br />the bui Iding blocks for the alternatives and include existing structural fea- <br />tures, potential structural features, and non-structural elements, also <br />referred to as "measures." Evaluations were performed on 98 structural ele- <br />ments and 26 non-structural elements to determine which plan elements could to <br />some degree meet the adopted plan purposes and which would be sui table for <br />plan formulation. A computerized River Basin Simulation Model (RIBSIM) was <br />used as a tool in analyzing water yield aspects of performance of the formu- <br />lated plans. <br /> <br />Information obtained in the previous tasks of Step 1 and Step 2 was <br />used in the plan formulation process. Study team members with expertise in <br />the areas of water resource planning, hydrology, water rights, economics, <br />hydraul ic design, and envi ronmental and social analyses met in workshop ses- <br />sions to formulate nine preliminary alternative plans representing a range of <br />potential water resource development for the St. Vrain Basin. The alternative <br />plans include combinations of structural and non-structural measures for meet- <br />ing the municipal, industrial, and agricultural water supply needs of the <br />Basin. Five of these plans were selected for evaluation in Task 2-9. A sixth <br />plan was subsequently formulated by CWRPDA staff, fol lowing response from the <br />publ ic and Advisors to the results of Task 2-9. <br /> <br />Both prior to and following evaluation, the alternative plans were <br />presented to the Study Adv i sors. Comments f rom the pub Ii c and the Study <br />Advisors were presented to the Study Management Commi ttee and incorporated <br />into the Final Report and Summary Report. <br /> <br />(B0349C) <br />