Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ,... <br /> -ItISTORIC.l.lSTCR.l5l!:VOLllHE <br /> ----- .u.rER/l~mESTOItI~VDUJ1E <br /> ~ ~ <br /> "" <br /> ,... <br />, <br />, <br />R <br />E <br />, ".. <br />E <br />E <br />, <br /> "OR <br /> ... <br /> . <br /> . " " " " " " .. <br /> ''''''' (Beginning in November 1972) <br /> Figure 3. Barnes Meadow Reservoir. <br /> <br /> <br />'OR <br /> <br />-taSTl)RICo\LSTOIUIilEVOLtH; <br />-.....I.lTElltlAIDE5TOItl.;fvCl1.llf: <br />~ / J <br />. <br />, , , ,/ <br /> <br />,.. <br /> <br />, <br />, <br />R <br />E <br />~ 2lJl1 <br />E <br />, <br /> <br />,.. <br /> <br />. <br />. II IS 21 25 'I :!IS ~. <br />IIONTH (Beginning in November 1972) <br />Figure 4. Twin Lake Reservoir. <br /> <br />was in the seven succeeding months. It is concluded <br />that the optional reservoir management scheme <br />tested by the model would not deteriorate instream <br />habitat conditions. <br /> <br />If instream uses were considered more valuable, it <br />would be easy to run the model again with imposed <br />constraints on minimum stream lIow. The <br />recreational potential of the high mountain reservoirs <br /> <br />5 <br />