My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00104
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00104
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:42:18 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 10:18:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
1995
Title
Exploring Ways of Increasing the Use of South Platte Water - Information Series 41
Author
John W. Labadie & John M. Shafer
Description
Technology described here for evaluating options in management of reservoir-stream water supply systems was developed in the water research program of the CWRRI.
Publications - Doc Type
Tech Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />01 a given volume 01 water as It is stored, transported. <br />dlstrrbuted and reused. The model also musl be able <br />to simulate each of many possible combinations 01 <br />reservo" releases IIIat could physically satisfy ex- <br />Isting and prOfected demands. Including Instream <br />flow. It also must be venfied as an accura te and <br />reliable model by duplicating the hlstorrc behavior 01 <br />the real system. <br /> <br />MODEL SPECtFICATIONS <br />The model should be capable 01 simulating a <br />.complex river basin system by monthly tline <br />Increments over a perrod of several years Monthly <br />'increments provide sufficient accuracy lor plan- <br />, nirig purposes and monthly hydrological data are <br />.,readily available. The purpose 01 the modet IS to <br />provide state and local water planners or <br />i'managers with an easy-to-use tool for evaluating <br />it,h.~..effect.s of water management options and <br />,changes iei system operation for the" effects on <br />,;water availability at all critical locations in a basin. <br />:..'Existing or planned priorities. (including legal) <br />.amo'ng vanous beneficial uses of wafer must be <br />"'Carefully preserved Special training or skill in <br /><computer operation should not be necessary In <br />:use of the model. <br />.'-' '. <br /> <br />I_HistOrlc<lIRiverFlow <br />r -----SimulatedRiveI" Flow <br /> <br />'"f <br />'" r <br />i <br />'" l <br />I <br />"r <br /> <br />,L_:::::::C~---------------------- <br /> <br />RELIABILITY OF MODEL <br /> <br />To explore possibilities 01 maximizing water usage <br />of sub-basins In the Colorado Front Range, a com- <br />puterrzed hydrotoglc computation (simulation model) <br />was developed, uSing the Cache La Poudre River as <br />a case. <br /> <br />The strong advantage of a model <br />is that. . . options can be tested <br />without diswption of the actual <br />system. <br /> <br />An extremely Important slep In simulation IS model <br />calibration. If fhe model can reasonably duplicate the <br />behavior of the real system. conlidence is developed <br />in its reliability. Computations that resutt In river flow <br />which reasonably match historical records 01 Ilow <br />indicate the model will correctly predict the Impacts <br />of changes In reservoir operation. The strong advan- <br />tage 01 a model IS that operational options can be <br />tested Without disruption of the actual sysfem. The <br />expense 01 developing and using a simulation model <br />IS negligible compared to the expense of cut-and-try <br />changes In the real sysfem. <br /> <br />1\ <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />\ <br />\~ <br /> <br />'-----' <br /> <br />'----' <br /> <br />,".(l}:,t<'i "!\((;INNU1G, 1" 1"()"t:~,OC~ \ST<> <br /> <br />.A '2 <br /> <br />Figure 1. Computer Simulation Flow vs. Historical Flows after Model Calibration. <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.