Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />(3) A volume on alternatives for the future use and allocation <br />of water in Colorado, on the impacts of such alternatives, <br />and on the possible means for achieving the alternatives. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />(4) This volume of legal studies which fully describes the <br />existing water rights system and possible changes in that <br />system, and which addresses several specific legal problems. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />'(5) A volume of special studies and technical appendices. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />It should be emphasized that none of the above reports will make <br />recommendations regarding the future use and distribution of water, <br />nor will they recommend changes in existing laws and policies. The pur- <br />pose of the publications is to provide a thorough basis for public <br />consideration and discussion of "directions for the future." Following <br />distribution of the publications and receipt of public comments and <br />suggestions, the Department of Natural Resources will make recommenda- <br />tions to the governor concerning future Colorado water policies and <br />the need for changes, if any, in the present water rights system. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />THE COLORADO WATER STUDY, LEGAL STUDIES <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Various future water allocation alternatives and the consequences <br />thereof have been described in the analytical volume of the water <br />study. The purpose of this volume of legal studies is to inventory <br />and analyze the legal tools which are available, or which could be <br />made available, to influence the future use of water in Colorado <br />and bring about, or avoid, any given series of consequences. This <br />volume is the primary source of the legal tools listed and analyzed <br />in the volume on alternatives for the future allocation of water. <br />The purpose of these legal studies is not to suggest that changes <br />in our water rights system are needed or that change would lead to <br />a better result than that yielded by the present system. The purpose <br />is simply to determine whether there are legal tools which could <br />influence the distribution and use of water and, to the extent that <br />such tools may exist, to analyze the constitutional or other legal <br />problems involved. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />In order to determine the range of tools available, numerous <br />technical, statutory, administrative, and constitutional tools were <br />examined. Only a few were eliminated from consideration at the <br />outset: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />(1) The water study does not consider or analyze the possibi- <br />lity of a constitutional amendment to abrogate the right <br />to appropriate water. The reason for this exclusion is <br />that most of the surface waters in the state are already <br />covered by final or conditional appropriations, and such <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />xix <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />