My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00101
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00101
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2010 3:55:22 PM
Creation date
9/30/2006 10:17:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
1994
Title
Fort Lyon Canal Company Water Transfer Alternatives Study - Final Report
CWCB Section
Finance
Author
Gronning Engineering
Description
Analysis of the alternative approaches to, and the results of the transfer of agricultural water supplies from the Ft. Lyon Canal Company to alternative uses
Publications - Doc Type
Brochure
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
204
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />STATE OF COLORADO <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />Department of Natural Resources <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />721 State Centennial Building <br />1313 Shennan Streel <br />Denver. Colorado 80203 <br />Phone (303) 866.3441 <br />FAX (303) 866.4474 <br /> <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br /> <br />Ken Sa1.wu <br />Executive Director, ONR <br /> <br />Daries C.lile. P.E. <br />Di=ror. CWCB <br /> <br />agricultural water users today, The implementation of a water bank involving FLee water (or <br />any other alternative) is a decision left solely to the FLCC and its shareholders. The ideas <br />contained in this Final Study Report present one possible option for the FLCC, but are not <br />intended to limit the range of alternatives or implementation strategies, Rather the conceptual <br />design being presented is intended to provide a basis from which discussion of future options can <br />begin, During these discussions, the conceptual design can be fine-tuned and modified as needed <br />to meet the needs and goals of the FLCC and the region, It is anticipated that these discussions <br />would necessarily involve business and community leaders, other water rights holders, and state <br />water officials before any final plan is selected and put into operation. <br /> <br />Finally, it is important to note that while the FLCC graciously shared information with the CWCB <br />and the consultant" conducting the study, the views expressed in this report are not to be taken <br />as any indication of the official position of the FLCC, Likewise, preparation and acceptance of <br />the report by the CWCB would not be interpreted as indicating official state endorsement of the <br />conceptual design recommended herein. Quite simply, there is no one way for agricultural water <br />users to meet the challenges they face today, nor is there any desire or ability for state <br />government to impose a solution on those water users or on other water users in the region, This <br />Final Study Report is intended to advance the discussion of future options, not to end the debate, <br />Hopefully, the various audiences to whom it is addressed will find it useful for that purpose, <br /> <br />Daries e, Lile <br />Director <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.