My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00101
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00101
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2010 3:55:22 PM
Creation date
9/30/2006 10:17:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
1994
Title
Fort Lyon Canal Company Water Transfer Alternatives Study - Final Report
CWCB Section
Finance
Author
Gronning Engineering
Description
Analysis of the alternative approaches to, and the results of the transfer of agricultural water supplies from the Ft. Lyon Canal Company to alternative uses
Publications - Doc Type
Brochure
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
204
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2. Economic, financial and social; commerce, opportunity and quality or lire <br /> <br />Water users are impacted by water transfers, but so are members of the local and regional <br />communities. For example, the dollar in the farmer's pocket pays taxes and is spent with the local <br />merchant, and the merchant in turn pays taxes. The impacts of a dollar spent can vary significantly: <br />a dollar deposited with out of state bank works differently than the dollar paid to the local farm <br />laborer. Transfer of water brings a one-time flow of cash to sellers; this mayor may not be spent <br />in the study area. Some (perhaps most) may be used to repay lenders, including some local bank <br />debts, which may increase local capital supply. However, there may be little need for additional <br />capital in the locality so it will flow elsewhere. <br /> <br />Transfer of water results in loss of acreage in irrigated agriculture: <br /> <br />a. If water is transferred outside the study area, loss of agricultural production is <br />greatest. <br />b. If water is reallocated within the study area to agriculture, loss of production is <br />lessened--and possibly no loss occurs. <br />c. If water is reallocated to other uses within study area (e.g., M&I, wildlife, recreation), <br />loss of agricultural production may be offset by economic gains in other sectors. <br />d. Ifwater transfer requires construction of diversion works within the study area, rather <br />than upstream, or requires revegetation of dried up land, there will be some <br />temporary economic benefit and job creation which will offset some of the economic <br />loss. <br />e. Loss of irrigated acreage will reduce property values in the study area. Lower <br />property values will adversely impact tax revenues of aIlloca1 governments, school <br />and special districts. Colorado constitution amendment 1 (1992) has added new <br />restrictions on tax revenues. <br /> <br />Transfer of water will result in loss of farming/ranching jobs. (Howe, Law and Weber 1990): <br /> <br /> <br />a. If water is reallocated to other uses within the study area there will be some <br />additional job growth in other sectors. <br />b. Substantial economic development efforts would be needed to maximize job growth <br />if water is reallocated within the state to other uses. <br /> <br />Transfer of water will result in loss of agribusiness sales (farm machinery, fuel, seed, herbicides) and <br />jobs related to processing or transporting agricultural products (Taylor and Young 1991, 296-297): <br /> <br />a. Loss of agricultural production and agribusiness sales will reduce retail and wholesale <br />trade in the study area due to negative multiplier effect. <br /> <br />b. If and when out-migration follows loss of local jobs, there will be further reduction <br />of retail and wholesale trade in the study area. <br /> <br />2-9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.