My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00100
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00100
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2011 11:13:17 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 10:17:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
1992
Title
An Analysis of Water Salvage Issues in Colorado
Author
CWCB
Description
An Analysis of Water Salvage Issues in Colorado
Publications - Doc Type
Water Resource Studies
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />been abandoned, The State Engineer is given broad powers to enforce priorities to water <br />by curtailing diversions by junior rights when supplies are short, Section 37-92-502(2)(a), <br />C.R.S. However, under the "futile call" doctrine he may not curtail a junior diversion, unless <br />he is reasonably certain the water will actually benefit the calling senior right. M, Under <br />this doctrine the SEO refuses to curtail a junior right for the benefit of a wasteful water <br />diversion, The SEO is also directed to investigate and remove abandoned water rights from <br />the priority system, Section 37-92-402, c.R.S, <br /> <br />These powers and duties can draw the SEO into any irrigation efficiency program, even <br />if there is no attempt to change the use of the water, Under current law, if efficiency <br />improvements are made by a water right holder, the SEO may reduce the size of any call <br />made by that right to the extent water is not needed for beneficial use, If actual diversion <br />rates remain reduced for a sufficiently long time the SEO could, or may be forced to, find <br />that a portion of the decreed water right of the improved system has been abandoned, <br />However, such a determination, while it might reduce a portion of the diversion right, could <br />not impair the irrigator's ability to continue to beneficially use the quantity of water actually <br />used and needed for the perfected historical purposes of the original appropriation, <br /> <br />18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.