Laserfiche WebLink
<br />III, Federal Programs Resulting in Salvage <br /> <br />HB 91-1154 directed that this analysis be limited to "water salvage which may result from <br />federal programs, including salinity control." This limitation probably reflects the fact that <br />irrigation efficiency improvements are already being installed in the Colorado River basin <br />by the Federal Salinity Control Program, Participants in the salinity program were uncertain <br />as to the effect these improvements would have on their water rights, HB 91-1110 was an <br />attempt to clarify the status of their water rights after salinity improvements are made, and <br />to grant participants a state recognized right to claim and transfer water no longer necessary <br />for diversion as a result of the salinity program, <br /> <br />Another reason for limiting the salvage analysis to that resulting from federal programs <br />may have been a belief that a saved water right could thereby be limited to the Western <br />Slope, The major U,S, Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) projects, including the Colorado-Big <br />Thompson and Fry-Ark, make their diversions on the West Slope, During debate on HB <br />91-1110 it became clear that the bill would be more acceptable if it did not apply statewide, <br />The Arkansas and South Platte River basins were presented as extremely over-appropriated <br />areas with extensive reliance on return flows, By excluding these basins, but avoiding the <br />appearance of special legislation, the bill's chances were presumed to be improved, <br /> <br />Federal programs do have significant potential for generating saved or salvaged water as <br />described below, The extent of those programs is very broad however, potentially reaching <br />all comers of the State, <br /> <br />A Federal Salinity Program <br /> <br />The Federal Salinity Control program was developed as a cooperative effort of state and <br />federal agencies to manage high salt concentrations in the Colorado River. Salinity was a <br />concern because of delivery obligations to Mexico, and also because it could interfere with <br />beneficial uses of water in the basin states, particularly in California and Arizona, The <br />program was established by the Salinity Control Act of 1974 and amended in 1984, 43 <br />U,S.c. Sections 1571-1599. The primary federal salinity activities with regards to irrigation <br />are construction of improved delivery systems by the USBR, and improved on-farm <br />irrigation systems designed and partially funded by the Soil Conservation Service (SCS), <br />Participation in either of these programs is entirely voluntary, In general USBR is lining <br />large canals and replacing leaky main ditches, SCS is helping farmers to better manage and <br />deliver water once it arrives on-farm with sprinkler systems and lined farm laterals. Both <br />activities are designed to reduce salt load into the Colorado River by reducing the deep <br />percolation which causes highly saline return flows in certain geographic areas, In Colorado <br />those areas include the Grand Valley on the Colorado River, the Uncompahgre Valley in <br />the lower Gunnison Basin, and the McElmo Creek area near Cortez, Colorado, The salinity <br />control program also has procedures for addressing municipal and industrial salt discharges <br />through state water quality regulation, <br /> <br />10 <br />