Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />CHAPTER II <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />In order to minimize losses to big-game hunting, estimated at 6,500 <br />man-days, 14,000 acres of private land would be acquired and developed, <br />along with 2,800 acres of adjacent public domain (a total of 16,800 acres). <br />The lands would be made available to the Colorado Division of Game, Fish <br />and Parks (now the Colorado Division of Wildlife) for administration as <br />big-game habitat. (BR Unpub 1968) <br /> <br />There was strong reaction from the Yellow Jacket Water Conservancy <br />Districtt Colorado River Water Conservation District, and Colorado Water <br />Conservation Board in regard to the inclusion. They objected to the pur- <br />chase of the private land as a mitigation measure, particularly because <br />substantially all of the new and supplemental land included for service <br />by the project is privately owned, and approximately 90 percent of the <br />new project land is presently in dryland wheat or under cultivation. <br />They felt that under present conditions this land was not suitable for <br />deer range and mitigation for its conversion to irrigation was not <br />justified. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />After a period of additional study and compromises, a second pro- <br />posed feasibility report was completed and distributed in 1972, along <br />with a proposed draft environmental statement. The plan presented in <br />this second report provided for a total annual water supply of 101,580 <br />acre-feet. Approximately 71,500 acre-feet of this would have been for <br />industrial use in the development of oil shale and coal and for the <br />municipal and domestic uses of the population increases expected to <br />accompany the industrial development. The remaining 30,080 acre-feet <br />were to be for irrigation of about 14,190 acres of land, including <br />3,690 acres of supplemental service land and 10,500 acres of full ser- <br />vice land now cultivated for dry farm wheat or improved range grasses. <br />No native rangeland was included for irrigation service. The plan <br />presented in the 1972 report provided for fee and easement purchase, <br />landowner agreements, and big-game habitat improvement on acquired land, <br />as well as public domain lands in the vicinity of Oak Ridge east of <br />Meeker. (BR Unpub 1972) <br /> <br />The Colorado Wildlife Commission voted against support of the pro- <br />ject and the Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, who had included <br />the above measure in its 1972 recommendations, revised its project <br />impact report in support of the Colorado agency. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Since 1972, dialogue has continued between the Conservancy District <br />board and the Bureau of Reclamation. Alternate plans have been discussed, <br />attempting to eliminate or reduce the environmental and wildlife objec- <br />tions to the project. Increased emphasis on National energy needs has <br />resulted in participation by coal and oil shale interests. In 1975, <br />public involvement and multiobjective planning became an integral part of <br />Yellow Jacket Project planning, as discussed in Chapter III. The results <br />of that planning are presented in detail, and more recent developments <br />are summarized in Chapter VII. <br /> <br />16 <br />