My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00083
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00083
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:41:28 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 10:14:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
1997
Title
Historical Dry and Wet Periods in Colorado (Draft Copy)
CWCB Section
Water Conservation & Drought Planning
Author
McKee, Doesken, Kleist
Description
Analysis tool used to describe both drought and wet events for periods in Colorado.
Publications - Doc Type
Tech Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />of snowfall due only to the upward vertical motion forced as air moves over the topograph. <br /> <br />These two set of conditions can produce complex patterns of snow on the ground which are then <br /> <br />followed by the conditions which lead to snowmelt and runoff. <br /> <br />One question often asked is how is the winter snow correlated to the following summer <br /> <br />precipitation. Table 15 provides the answer to this question. These correlations show very little <br /> <br />relationship between the winter snow and following summer precipitation. Again the numbers in <br /> <br />circles are for the same basins. <br /> <br />The correlations of April! SSI to streamflow (ST) and 12 month September 30 SPI to <br /> <br /> <br />streamflow (ST) are given in Tables 16 and 17. These again show some relationship between the <br /> <br /> <br />variables. The SSI to streamflow (ST) are the basis of work done by the Natural Resource <br /> <br /> <br />Conservation Service (NRCS) ofthe USDA to forecast streamflow (ST) ( need reference here) . <br /> <br /> <br />However, they use both April and May snowpack observation and more sophisticated statistical <br /> <br /> <br />techniques to develop forecast relationships. Consequently, their forecast are better than the <br /> <br />simple correlation results given here. <br /> <br />25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.