My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Report of the State Auditor 1993
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
Report of the State Auditor 1993
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2010 3:55:23 PM
Creation date
9/30/2006 10:13:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
1993
Title
CWCB CF Performance Audit Report of the State Auditor February 1993
CWCB Section
Finance
Author
State Auditor
Description
Performance Audit February 1993
Publications - Doc Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />16 <br /> <br />Water Conservation Board Construction Fund Performance Audit-February 1993 <br /> <br />Board's Planning Process Has Not Been Fully <br />Developed <br /> <br />The management of water resources' is a long-range effort. Many projects require <br />, substantial and lengthy planning as well as several years to construct. Therefore, <br />planning efforts should consider water needs and concerns well into the future. <br /> <br />The Department of Natural Resources <br />developed a four-year plan in early <br />1992. The Board's input was included <br />in the plan. The plan has some goals <br />and objectives related to the Board's Construction Fund. However, the Board has <br />not developed its own long~term plan that-recognizes Departmental goals and <br />ensures the best use of monies available in the Construction Fund in achieving <br />those goals. The Board has not developed an implementation plan which: <br /> <br />The Board does not have a long- <br />term plan for achieving goals. <br /> <br />· Prioritizes projects consistent with long-term goals. <br /> <br />· 'Establishes milestones which monitor progress toward meeting goals. <br /> <br />· Provides performance measures to assess the effectiveness of activities. <br /> <br />Perfoimance measures are particularly important because they should measure the <br />effectiveness of a program as directly as possible. They need to be useful to <br />managers for monitoring projects and to legislators and policy makers. For <br />example, a performance measure might be the total cost of increasing the capacity <br />of existing dams per additional acre-foot of water storage compared to the total <br />cost of building a new dam. <br /> <br />Recently, the Board has begun to pursue a more active role. It has identified a <br />number of projects that it would like to accomplish over a period of years. The <br />Board, has also requested authorization for a new program which will enable it to <br />encourage the development of small dam sites. This may result in an increased <br />need for Board funds. <br /> <br />We recognize that Water issues are varied <br />The Board can help facilitate and complex. The Board cannot realistically <br />the resolution of water issues. set water priorities, for the State by itself. <br />However, it can perform a valuable role in <br />providing, a forum for diverse interests and helping to form collaborative <br />relationships in seeking solutions for state water issues. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.