My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00071
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00071
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2010 3:55:23 PM
Creation date
9/30/2006 10:13:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
1994
Title
Small Dam Site Reconnaissance Study - Evaluation of Prospect Dam and Reservoir
CWCB Section
Finance
Author
Harris Water Engineering, Inc.
Description
Identify and evaluate dam sites at a recon leval, dam sites to fill a need for raw water storage
Publications - Doc Type
Tech Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> <br />The followings steps are recommended to enlarge the Red Mesa Dam: <br /> <br />1. The Red Mesa Reservoir and Ditch Company stock holders must <br />decide if an annual payment of about $75,000 can be paid for the <br />increased storage, the payment must be made regardless if water is <br />available. To assist in making this decision the Company Board can <br />evaluate the need for augmentation water and the potential income <br />from selling the water. The possible State Engineer requirement to <br />enlarge the spillway and replace the outlet gate should also be <br />factored into the decision. If not, no further work is necessary; <br />if yes continue. Soonest winter of 1994. <br /> <br />2. Apply for feasibility study funds from the CWCB to prepare <br />detailed engineering evaluations of the enlargement. If the <br />feasibility study funds are provided by the CWCB to evaluate the <br />enlargement, it should be with the intent to provide a construction <br />loan at reduced terms (e.g. 2% for 40 years). Soonest spring of <br />1994. <br /> <br />3. The feasibility study is suggested to evaluate the: water <br />supply; demand for augmentation water; spillway sizing based on the <br />PMP; various enlargement options based on supply, demand and <br />spillway size; plans to obtain land for the enlargement; <br />environmental compliance requirements; plans and cost to repair the <br />existing dam with a new spillway and outlet gate; and if feasible <br />develop an enlargement plan with costs. The water supply is a <br />complicated evaluation because of the LaPlata River Compact and <br />availability of winter flows. Even though the reservoir cost per <br />acre-foot decreases as the reservoir size increases, a smaller <br />reservoir may be advantageous because of the water supply. If an <br />enlargement is found to be infeasible, it is recommended that the <br />study costs be forgiven. Soonest is summer of 1994. <br /> <br />4. Assuming the enlargement is feasible, apply for CWCB <br />construction funding. Once construction funding is available, <br />prepare plans and specifications for the enlarged dam and <br />simul taneously prepare the environmental compliance documents (e. g. <br />404 permit). Soonest summer fall of 1995. <br /> <br />5. Assuming the plans <br />environmental permits are <br />Soonest summer of 1996. <br /> <br />and specifications are approved, and <br />approved; construct the enlargement. <br /> <br />Red Mesa Dam <br /> <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.