My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00070
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00070
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2010 8:58:17 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 10:12:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
1998
Title
Ground Water and Surface Water A Single Resource U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1139
CWCB Section
Interstate & Federal
Author
T.C. Winter, J.W. Harvey, O.L. Franke, W.M. Alley
Description
Overview of current understandimg of interaction of ground water and surface water in terms of quality and quantity
Publications - Doc Type
Historical
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
88
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />R <br /> <br />Effects of the Removal of Flood-Plain <br />Vegetation on the Interaction of <br />Ground Water and Surface Water <br /> <br />In low-lying areas where the water table is close to land <br />surface. such as in flood plains. transpiration directly from <br />ground water can reduce ground-water discharge to surface <br />water and can even cause surface water to recharge ground <br />water (see Figure 7). This process has attracted particular <br />attention in arid areas, where transpiration by phreatophytes <br />on flood plains of western rivers can have a significant effect <br />on streamflows. To assess this effect, a study was done on <br />transpiration by phreatophytes along a reach of the Gila River <br />upstream from San Carlos Reservoir in Arizona. During the <br />first few years of the 1 O-year study, the natural hydrologic <br />system was monitored using observation wells, streamflow <br />gages, and meteorological instruments. Following this initial <br />monitoring period, the phreatophytes were removed from the <br />flood plain and the effects on streamflow were evaluated. The <br />average effect of vegetation removal over the entire study <br />reach was that the Gila River changed from a continually <br />losing river for most years before clearing to a gaining stream <br />during some months for most years following clearing. Specifi- <br />cally, average monthly values of gain or loss from the stream <br />indicated that before clearing, the river lost water to ground <br />water during all months for most years. After clearing, the river <br />gained ground-water inflow during March through June and <br />during September for most years (Figure R-l). <br /> <br /> <br />Gila River, Arizona. (Photograph by Gregory Pope.) <br /> <br />71 <br /> <br /> <br />'" 5 <br />>- <br />Cl 4 <br />o <br />~ ' <br />w <br />"- <br />'" <br />w <br />5, <br /><: <br /><: 0 <br />~-, <br />~ <br />~ -2 <br /> <br />Before removal of phreatophytes <br />from flood plain <br /> <br /> <br />j <br />Flow <br />from river <br />Flow <br />into river <br />I <br /> <br />JFMAMJJASOND <br /> <br />'" 5 <br />>- <br />g 4 After removal of phreatophytes <br />o from flood plain <br />M , <br />'" <br />w <br />"- <br />'" <br />w <br />5, <br /><: <br /><: 0 <br />g-l <br />~ <br />~ <br />-2 <br /> <br />I <br />Flow <br />from river <br />Flow <br />into river <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />JFMAMJJASOND <br /> <br />Ffgure R-1. Removal of phreatophytes from the ffood plain <br />along a losing reach of the Gila River in Arizona resulted in <br />the river receiving ground-water inflow during some months <br />of the year. (Modified from Culler, R.C., Hanson, R.L., Myrick. <br />R.M.. Tumer, R.M., and Kipple, FP.. 1982, Evapotranspira- <br />tion before and after clearing phreatophytes, Gila River flood <br />plain, Graham County, Arizona: U.S. Geological Professional <br />Paper 655-P.) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.