|
<br />-73-
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />of land are now irrigated in the seventeen ,:estern ari-d or semi--arid
<br />states, and in the otl)e l' thirty-one states, there are presentlY irri- '
<br />gated 1,529,,290 acr,es of land. The total for all of the country is
<br />26,398, 2 ~O (teres. 'Of the irrigated acreage in the seventeell -(,estern
<br />states, slightly more than 6,000,000 acres of iandhave been provided
<br />by Bureau of,ileclamation projects with a new or supplemeIltalwater
<br />supply.
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />Irrigation permits a more intensi-ve use of land, and, where water
<br />supplies, are adequate for a givell irrigation system, an assured year-in
<br />and year-out high level of production, less influenced by vagaries of
<br />season and \leather than any other t) pe of agriculture. Only six-tenths
<br />of one per cent of the world's land is irrigated, but this irrigated
<br />acreage provides a greater diversification than other forms of farming,
<br />and thus helps both the economic stability of agricultural areas and
<br />the living standards of consumers. For these reasons, irrigation"
<br />formerly confined to the arid regions of the lvest, has steadily oeen
<br />spreading eastward. ,As an example, take note of tr~ increase in irri-
<br />gation,in these states during the past ten years: New York, 5,900 to
<br />19,200 acres; New Jersey, 8,000 to 28,00'0 acres; South Carolina, 4ll
<br />to 6,400 acres; liiassachusetts, 2,000 to 18,50'0 acres;F1orida, 132,'000
<br />to 363,'000 acres; Arkansas, ,162,000 to 419,000 acres; and liisconsin,
<br />2,345 to 9,781 acres. liiuch of tr.e irrigation outside of the seventeen
<br />arid land states is accomplished by pumping underground water supplies.
<br />It is interesting to observe, too, that states east of the ninety-eighth
<br />meridianenc:ounter legal difficulties when any extensive diversion of
<br />water from natural streams is considered. This is because these states
<br />embrace the, riparian doctrine of water lavr, as distinguished from the
<br />doctrine of prior appropriation Which is largely practiced in the
<br />,:estern states.
<br />
<br />..
<br />
<br />The ,Eleventh census (that f.or 189'0 with, acreage figures for 1889)
<br />was ,the first to give attention to irrigation. ,This census, report
<br />,listed the Colorado irrigated land by c'ounties. The irr:i:gated acreage
<br />in Colorado duriDg the past .one hundred years , as disclosed by the
<br />census, may be noted by the following figures: From a few hundred acres
<br />in 1852, to 891,000 acres in 1889, 1,611,00'0 acres i-n 1899, 3,394,000
<br />acres in 1929, 3,221,000 acres in 1939 and about 2,941,000 acres in 1949.
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />The year 1902 was the beginning of anew era in ,irri-gation devel-
<br />opmentin the ';.e,st. Federal reclamation of arid and semi-arid lands,
<br />as it is known today, was initiated by the passage of the heclamation
<br />Act of' June 17, '19'02. The original act and subsequent legislation es-
<br />tablished this Federal reclamation program for the seventeen \.estern
<br />states. In 1901"President Theodore Roosevelt, in urging initiation
<br />of this Feder~l irrigation program for the \~st) made a significant
<br />statement. It emphasized the need for the program and he pointed out
<br />that it should be undertaken in full recognition and application of
<br />state water laws. He stated:
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />. -11
<br />
|