Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.-60.... <br /> <br />these years was 1,20.0.,0.0.0. acre-feet of wh1ch about two-th1rds "as return <br />flO1, to the r1ver. an th1s bas1s ,for every three RecMld'.feet di.verted <br />from the r1ver and app11ed as i.rrigation, two secwnd-feet returns for <br />reuse in canals on dovmstream. The one secnncl..f()ot unaccounted for is <br />assumed to be consumptive use. ',villi.s .u0lwludes that increase in diver- <br />sion is a major contribution to l..,turll flow. <br /> <br />About 190.9 the area irrigated in the valley west of Bridgeport <br />approximated 50. 00.0. acres and not until after 1912 did the return flow. <br />become perceptible. Additional lands were put under irrigation and by' <br />1919 had reached a total of 2"..0.0.0. acres ill the valley between Whalen <br />and Bridgeport. III 1.9~7 t,he irrigated area approximated 350.,0.0.0. <br />acres. \'/illi.s found that the mean monthly flow of the river, after the <br />Pathfinder Rescl'Voir began storing flood water in 1910., was about 50. <br />;pet'oenc less for Nay and June than the mean prior to that time. For <br />.1uly it was about 30. percent less; August,95 percent more; September, <br />22.' percent more; and for o.ctober, 215 percent more. This increase in <br />river flow during these mo~ths being the result of the application of <br />water to irrigated lands between Whalen and North Platte, Nebraska. It <br />is to be noted that the very large increase in the return flow occurs <br />during September and o.ctober. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The increased. diversions from the river are believed to be the <br />major contribution to the return flow. Most of the water returning to <br />the river is through deep percolation and is designated as "invisible <br />return flow." It is believed that the extent of return flow to the <br />North Platte is the greatest for any of our western streams. Because <br />of this substantial increase in the available water supply for irriga- <br />tion the stability of agriculture in this valley is definitely assured. <br /> <br />During recent years many western streams that provide water for <br />irrigation, have been studied to determine the extent of return flow. <br />The Sacramento River between Red Bluff and Sacramento during July for <br />the years 1924 to 1928 inclusive had an average return flow of 36 per- <br />cent of the river flow. However, streams having wide valleys and of <br />flat grade may show losses instead of gains in discharge. (The San Luis <br />Valley along the Rio Grande is an example, according to Dr. Wm. p. <br />Headden.) <br /> <br />In the Poudre River Valley, in northern Colorado, during the <br />period of irrigation development, about 1 second-foot was considered <br />to be required per 80. acres of land. At that time the general water <br />table was at a considerable depth and the area irrigated was not large. <br />From 1870. to 1880. the irrigated acreage in the valley was .increased to <br />about 15,00.0. acres and at the time the first return flow measurements <br />were taken in 1885 the total irrigated area had reached about 70.,0.0.0. <br />acres. The return flow from the mouth. of the Canyon to Greeley in 1885 <br />was less than 50. second-feet. The irrigated area in the valley in- <br />Creased with the years and for the period 190.6 to 1910. the return flow <br />to the river had increased to more than 20.0. second-feet during the fall <br />months. This can only be accounted for through the substantial amount <br />of return flow, and reuse of the water supply. (434 acres per second- <br />foot is high efficiency.) , <br />