Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-21-. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />vicinity of Fort Collins and Greeley, the science and art of irrigation <br />practices were extended by the bolder spirits to the reclamation of <br />greater areas of land far~removed from the local source of water supplies; <br />how men of vision later foreseeing the exhaustion of the normal stream <br />flow, conceived and brought about the existence of a great system' of stor- <br />age reservoirs for equalizing stream flows; and finally, as the need for <br />greater supplies became manifest, pierced the mountains with expensive <br />tunnels, and by the use of many miles of great canal systems, supplemented <br />their local supplies by diversions from foreign drainage areas; and when <br />it seemed that individual arid corporate ability had been exhausted, the <br />Federal Government was appealed to to construct huge systems of storage <br />and distribution beyond the ability of individu~ls and corporations to <br />finance. These great accomplishments have not been consummated without <br />hindrances and discouragements, yet,have gone forward under conditions, <br />economically both fair and foul, during periods cfhigh mortality to rail- <br />ways, banking institutions, mining and manufacturing industries. <br /> <br />Such have been the transformations wrought within the brief span of <br />a single life. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />We, as a young Nation, inherite.d many of our basic laws from England, <br />our Mother country, which as jn mos~ humid regions, recognized the Com- <br />~on law doctrine of riparian ownersh~p which, among other things, pro- <br />vides that one owning land adjacent to, or abutting on a stream, is vested <br />with the right to have the waters thereof flow past his land substa;ntiall <br />undiminished in quantity or quality.' That he may take therefrom only so <br />much of the water as may be required to meet the needs of his household <br />and livestock; but should he take an' additional amount over and above <br />those requirements, he must return the excess amount to the stream before <br />it leaves his land. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Our forefathers realized that such a theory is not applicable to an <br />arid or semi-arid region where the maximum consumptive use of the water <br />is necessary to produce food products and to sustain life. So in fram- <br />ing the Constitution of our State, our forefathers repudiated the <br />Doctrine of riparian O1ffiership as it applies to the use of water, and <br />adopted ,'That is knmIU as the ~Doctrine of Appropriation," which is now <br />the recognized law in seventeen of our western States. Thirteen .other <br />states have recognized this principle by legislative enactments. <br />Colorado, as I recall, "Tith t,IQ or three exceptions, is the only State <br />of the West which has this announced principle written into its constitu- <br />tion. . <br /> <br />The ~J?PJ:'opr~~~ive DoetriTle_.:'Ias. first ~llngJlnSce,'LinJ...872in__tbe .cas.e <br />of Yunker vs. Nichols-;--as reported in the First' Colorado Reports of our <br />Supreme Court. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The Territory of Colorado was created by Act of Congress out of <br />lands which were then parts of the States or Territories of Kansas, <br />Nebraska, Utah and New I1exico. Local Qustoms 'lith respect to the use <br />of Hater which had developed ;Jrior to tilat time involved important <br />questions relative to the rights of different appropriators, both as to <br />quantity and time of use. These differences later resulted in the noted ~ <br />decision of the Territorial Supreme Court, in Yunker vs. Nichols in 1872.' . <br />---......_------------- ---~-~------ <br /> <br />~ <br />