My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00060
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00060
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2011 11:12:21 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 10:11:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
1998
Title
SECWD/Arkansas Basin Future Water and Storage Needs Assessment
Author
GEI Consultants, Inc
Description
SECWD/Arkansas Basin Future Water and Storage Needs Assessment
Publications - Doc Type
Water Resource Studies
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
283
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />--i <br /> <br />) <br /> <br />, <br />Ii <br />I <br />" <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />-1 <br /> <br />Water and Storage Needs Assessment <br />SECWCD/Assessment Enterprise <br />December 10,1998 <br /> <br />I. The District should focus its initial deliberations on the Lake Meredith Enlargement, <br />Fry-Ark Project Reoperation, Turquoise Lake Enlargement, Pueblo Reservoir <br />Enlargement, Gravel Lakes storage, and non-structural alternatives. These <br />alternatives involve Project facilities or options that work conjunctively with Project <br />facilities. <br /> <br />2. Execute a Memorandum of Agreement with Colorado Springs to allow collaboration <br />and technical oversight by the District in their technical reviewlNEPA compliance <br />study. <br /> <br />3. Update and refine the existing Fry-Ark operations model to include storage of Winter <br />Water, "if-and-when" water, and East Slope Project water. <br /> <br />4. Continue discussions with the U.S, Bureau of Reclamation relative to "reoperation" <br />and Project reservoir enlargements. <br /> <br />5. Hold meeting(s) with SSC to evaluate financing options. <br /> <br />6. Further evaluate the "Valley Pipeline" concept. <br /> <br />7. Conduct follow-up information meetings with constituent groups. <br /> <br />8. Maintain the Storage Study Committee process. <br /> <br />9. Conduct system operations studies for various combinations of storage options. This <br />should -include evalttation-of opelations-seenatios-thatwould-enhanceinstream flows <br />and recreational opportunities. These studies also should consider potential water <br />quality impacts, particularly related to reoperation. <br /> <br />10. Conduct preliminary environmental studies to assess potential "fatill flaws." <br /> <br />II. Review identified non-structural water management options that could be integrated <br />into aI1referred_Pllln_Q[wateLd~ve1opmenL _ _ _ __ _. . _ _ __ _ _ _ <br /> <br />12. Undertake legal/institutional reviews relative to the identified storage/reoperations <br />alternatives. <br /> <br />Colorado Springs is proceeding with assessment of permitting issues associated with their <br />identified storage needs. In order to avoid duplication of efforts, we recommend that the District <br />and Colorado Springs work cooperatively. <br /> <br />97411\FinaU\TEXT.A.WPD <br /> <br />m GEl Consultants, Inc. <br /> <br />-VII- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.