My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00060
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00060
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2011 11:12:21 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 10:11:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
1998
Title
SECWD/Arkansas Basin Future Water and Storage Needs Assessment
Author
GEI Consultants, Inc
Description
SECWD/Arkansas Basin Future Water and Storage Needs Assessment
Publications - Doc Type
Water Resource Studies
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
283
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />--j <br />I <br /> <br />Water and Storage Needs Assessment <br />SECWCDI Assessment Enterprise <br />December 10,1998 <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />DESCRIPTIONS OF EXISTING WATER SYSTEMS <br /> <br />2.1 <br /> <br />Primary Water Supply Sources <br /> <br />Water users in the SECWCD obtain water from three primary sources: 1) native surface water <br />supplies, 2) imported water supplies from the Fryingpan-Arkansas (Fry-Ark) Project and other <br />transmountain diversions, and 3) ground water, including springs, alluvial wells, and non- <br />tributary wells. A general description of these sources is provided in Sections 2.1.1 through <br />2.1.4. In Section 2.2, water supply sources and general system characteristics are presented for <br />25 larger municipal and industrial (M&I) water supply entities (23 larger municipal entities in <br />the SECWCD, plus Public Service Company of Colorado and the City of Aurora) and <br />summarized for the numerous smaller M&I entities within the SECWCD. The City of Aurora, <br />while not located within the SECWCD, has extensive water holdings in the Basin. Similar <br />discussions are provided in Section 2.3 for the agricultural water supply entities. Like many <br />river basins in Colorado, the majority of water use in the Arkansas Basin is for irrigated <br />agriculture. The arrangement of canal and ditch systems, and the development of alluvial wells <br />for irrigation, has resulted in a substantial amount of agricultural "re-use" in the lower Basin, <br />because irrigation return flows are made available to down-gradient irrigation systems. <br /> <br />As population growth continues (Section 3), M&I water use is projected to increase in proportion <br />to agricultural water use, which.is anticipated to remain fairly constant (or decline somewhat) <br />over the planning horizon (year 2040). This situation may result in the need to develop <br />additional water supplies and to change how existing water sources and supply facilities are <br />operated. <br /> <br />--I -1;1.1 Native Surface WaterSupplies <br /> <br />As shown on Figure 2.1, which serves as a key map for this report, the Arkansas River rises in <br />the Rocky Mountains, near Leadville, in central Colorado. From its source to Canon City, <br />Colorado, the stream is a typical mountain torrent, descending from Elevation 11,500 to <br />Elevation 5,300. This section is characterized by a succession of narrow valleys separated by <br />short canyon sections. Between Canon City and Pueblo, the valley widens slightly and is flanked <br />by foothills as it descends to Elevation 4,700 at Pueblo. Here the river emerges into a plains <br />section and the stream course is characterized by low banks and a broad, sandy bed that shifts <br />frequently. Elevation of the streambed at John Martin Dam is 3,765 feet and from there descends <br />gradually to 1,800 feet at Great Bend, Kansas. Slopes vary from a maximum of about 110 feet <br />per mile in the mountain reaches to about 7 feet per mile in the plains section. Above John <br />Martin Dam, these slopes result in flood flows characterized by rapid rise, high peak discharge, <br />and short duration, while the more moderate slopes between the dam and state line tend to flatten <br />the peaks and extend the duration of a flood wave. The river above John Martin Dam is 300 <br /> <br />97411\FinaUlTEXT_A.WPD <br /> <br />2-1 <br /> <br />ffi <br />~ GEl Consultants, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.