My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00057
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00057
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:40:45 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 10:10:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
1978
Title
The Colorado Water Study Directions for the Future
CWCB Section
Water Conservation & Drought Planning
Author
EDO DNR
Description
First publicatiom of the Colorado Water Study volumes
Publications - Doc Type
Brochure
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />large number of water users. Therefore, the water study will include <br />a special analysis of several specific water law issues: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />1. The plan for augmentation. This special study discusses <br />the origins, impacts, and implications of plans for aug- <br />mentation, as defined in the 1969 revisions to Colorado <br />water law. The study examines some of the problems of <br />conjunctive management of surface waters and ground water <br />resources. This includes examination of the respective <br />rights of surface diverters and examination of wells in <br />aquifers which are tributary to surface streams. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />2. Senate bill 213 wells. A related problem is that of the <br />so-called "S.B. 213" wells, as specified under sec. 37-90- <br />137(4), C.R.S. 1973. The law provides for the issuance of <br />permits for wells in non-tributary ground water sources <br />not included in a designated ground water basin. A number <br />of issues arise: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />a. Whether such ground water is subject to the doctrine <br />of prior appropriation or to a doctrine of limited <br />ownership of water by the overlying landowner. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />b. Whether the statute contemplates a continued regula- <br />tory authority over such wells by the state engineer. <br />If so, are such wells to be administered on a priority <br />basis, a non-injury basis, or on some other basis? <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />c. Whether the rate of pumping from such aquifers should <br />be limited. If so, what rate of drawdown is best, <br />and how should the drawdown be measured? <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />d. Whether owners of existing wells in the same aquifer <br />may enjoin or limit the drilling of new wells or the <br />rate of pumping in other wells. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />3. Flow decrees v. volume decrees. From time to time it has <br />been suggested that Colorado adopt a decree system that <br />incorporates volumetric limits on water use, rather than <br />the flow limitations now in use. The water study will <br />briefly discuss the respective merits and liabilities of <br />each system and the practical problems involved in con- <br />version to a volumetric system. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.