Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />River Compact, coupled with estimates of virgin flows dating from <br />1906, indicate that up to one million acre-feet of water per year, <br />on the average, may remain for consumption in Colorado a However, an <br />unfavorable interpretation of the compact, or downward revisions of <br />virgin flow estimates, could result in a substantial reduction in <br />that figure. In addition, ongoing litigation concerning salinity stan- <br />dards under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act could result in <br />restrictions on future consumption of water from the Colorado River. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />East of the Continental Divide, it is clear that there is little <br />additional water left to consume, given physical and legal limitations <br />and present consumptive uses. The surface water supplies of the Laramie, <br />Arkansas, and Rio Grande river basins are, for all practical purposes, <br />fully utilized. On the North Platte River, additional water could <br />be devoted to irrigation on only a specified amount of land, but un- <br />limited amounts could apparently be devoted to any other use.* In the <br />South Platte River basin, only about 300,000 acre-feet of water per <br />year remain, on the average, for Colorado to consume. However, it <br />is unlikely that more than about two-thirds of that amount can be con- <br />sumed since significant amounts of return flows from irrigated <br />agriculture enter the river too far downstream to be recaptured. <br />Finally, while significant ground water reserves underlie the <br />Northern High Plains region, they are being pumped at rates which <br />probably will exhaust this source over the next 25 to 50 years. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Even though legally available to Colorado, the amount of water <br />which can actually be developed for additional future consumption <br />in any basin may be limited by recurring droughts. This is because <br />low priority conditional decrees, which would receive relatively <br />little or no water during times of low flow, may never be developed <br />due to the risks of reliance on such uncertain water supplies. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />In short, Colorado water supplies are limited, and their avail- <br />ability is subject to fluctuation and uncertainty. In light of these <br />facts, Colorado has developed a system for the distribution and use <br />of water, which recognizes water rights as property rights that can <br />be severed from the land and freely trans~erred to other uses or <br />locations. This water rights system, as embodied in the Colorado <br />Constitution, statutes, and case law, is described below. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />*Under the terms of the U.S. Supreme Court decree in Nebraska v. <br />Wyoming, 325 U.S. 589 (1945), as amended by subsequent order of the <br />court (345 U.S. 981) in 1953, Colorado may irrigate 145,000 acres in <br />Jackson County. Estimates of acreage currently irrigated range from <br />110,000 LO 125,000 acres. The decree also limits the amount of trans- <br />basin diversions. However, domestic and municipal uses are not limited, <br />and the decree is silent on all other uses. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />I <br />