Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Metropolitan Water Supply Investigation <br /> <br />MWSI Results <br /> <br />The results of the Phase II modeling showed a potential yield of up to 60,000 acre-feet <br />could be attained annually from a conjunctive use arrangement with no net depletion of <br />the aquifer. This yield increased to 73,000 acre-feet assuming that a 300-year aquifer life <br />could be tolerated, <br /> <br />The following assumptions were made in these Phase II analyses, <br /> <br />· All of Denver's estimated 85,000 acre-feet of unused divertible supplies (including <br />Blue River, South Platte and Moffat supplies) were treated as a single inflow to <br />Denver's system, available for conjunctive use, divertible at Strontia Springs and <br />storable in Denver's reservoirs. <br /> <br />· All of Denver existing raw storage (505,000 acre-feet) was treated as a single <br />reservoir, available for borrowing and capable of capturing Denver's unused <br />divertible supplies, <br /> <br />· A borrowing storage trigger of200,000 acre-feet (Denver's total storage level <br />below which borrowing is suspended). <br /> <br />. A borrowing limit of 100,000 acre-feet <br /> <br />· DCWRA providers' combined wen pumping capacity of 9,000 acre-feet per month <br />(equal to peak month demand for 60,000 AF per year), <br /> <br />· Well recharge capacity of 4,500 acre-feet per month (equal to 50% of well <br />pumping capacity) is feasible over the long term. <br /> <br />. A new 12,000 acre-feet peaking reservoir in Douglas County. <br /> <br />· A new pipeline of unlimited capacity from Conduit 26 to DCWRA providers, <br /> <br />Under the simplifYing assumptions made in this Phase II analysis, the results suggested <br />that conjunctive use could be a source of significant new yield, The important roles of <br />aquifer recharge and of borrowing-pay back arrangements with Denver's surface <br />reservoirs in capturing additional surface supplies became obvious. The results of the <br />Phase II studies were sufficiently positive to warrant further investigation, which is <br />occurring in the Southern Regional Cooperative Action Study (SRCAS), <br /> <br />Southern Reaional CooDerative Action StudY <br /> <br />The conjunctive use analyses undertaken in the SRCAS relied on a more detailed model <br />and more refined assumptions and data regarding Denver's unused divertible supplies, <br />surface water reservoirs available for borrowing and facility capacities, The model <br />included a more detailed representation of Denver's upper South Platte and Blue River <br />systems and DCWRA providers, Cheesman, Dillon and Eleven-Mile reservoirs were <br />modeled separately and were considered as the only Denver reservoirs available for <br />potential inclusion in a conjunctive use plan. Daily estimates were obtained of Denver' s <br />unused Blue River and South Platte divertible supplies under Denver's Near-Term water <br />use scenario. These supplies were split into those portions occurring tributary to Dillon, <br />Cheesman, Eleven Mile, and Strontia Springs. Model runs explicitly reflected capacity <br />constraints for all new and existing pipelines and reservoirs in the system, <br /> <br />55 <br /> <br />Prepared for the Colorado Water Conservation Board, Colorado Department of Natural Resources by <br />Hydrosphere Resource Consultants, 100:2 Walnut Street, Suite 200, Boulder. CO 80302 <br />