My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00053
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00053
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2011 11:12:09 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 10:10:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
1999
Title
Metropolitian Water Supply Investigation Final Report
Author
Hydrosphere Resource Consultants
Description
Metropolitian Water Supply Investigation Final Report
Publications - Doc Type
Water Resource Studies
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
206
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Metropolitan Water Supply Investigation <br /> <br />MWSI Results <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />under a first use arrangement with downstream irrigation rights, However, it is possible <br />that the yield of a conjunctive use project could be enhanced by considering potential first <br />use arrangements as another source of surface supply, <br /> <br />3.2.1.4. Groundwater and Aquifer Availability <br /> <br />Two potential groundwater resources were identified as part of the MWSI's study of <br />conjunctive use concepts: the Denver Basin nontributary aquifer system and the Beebe <br />Draw alluvial aquifer system, These two aquifer systems are the largest groundwater <br />resources within reasonable proximity to the metro Denver area, <br /> <br />There are enormous differences between these two aquifer systems from the perspective <br />of a conjunctive use project for the metro Denver area. While both aquifers are <br />essentially nontributary with respect to South Platte River surface flows, the Denver <br />Basin aquifers are much deeper, geographically much more extensive (underlying about <br />6,800 square miles compared to 300 square miles for the Beebe Draw), and have much <br />more water in storage, Artificial recharge of the Denver Basin aquifers would require use <br />of well injection, while the Beebe Draw could be recharged via surface ponds, The water <br />quality of the Denver Basin aquifers is generally better than Beebe Draw aquifers, <br /> <br />There are other groundwater resources that could potentially be used in conjunctive use <br />arrangements, such as the alluvial aquifers of Lost Creek and Box Elder Creek and <br />aquifers in the South Park area of the Upper South Platte, <br /> <br />Denver Basin Aauifers <br /> <br />The Denver Basin groundwater basin underlies approximately 6,700 square miles as <br />shown in Figure 7, It extends from Greeley in the north to Colorado Springs in the south <br />and from the Front Range in the west to the high plains in the east In ascending order <br />the Denver Basin aquifers include the Laramie-Fox Hills, Arapahoe, Denver and Dawson <br />aquifers, There is an enormous amount of water in storage in the Denver Basin aquifers, <br />approximately 467 million acre-feet, 300 million acre-feet of which is recoverable <br />(Robson, 1987). The total amount of recoverable water in the five county metro Denver <br />area is estimated to be approximately 150 million acre-feet, with approximately 40 <br />million acre- feet beneath Douglas County alone (Van Slyke, 1993). The areas of greatest <br />aquifer thickness and best well production occur in southwestern Arapahoe and northern <br />Douglas Counties. The water quality of the Denver Basin aquifers is generally good, <br /> <br />48 <br /> <br />Prepared for the Colorado Water Conservation Board, Colorado Department of Natural Resources by <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.