Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Metropolitan Water Supply Investigation <br /> <br />MWSI Results <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />3.1.2.2. Colorado River Basin <br /> <br />The Colorado River Basin has been a major source of water supply for agricultural and <br />municipal water users since the early 1900's, South Platte Basin municipal and industrial <br />water providers obtain about 30% of their existing water supply from the Colorado River <br />Basin. The areas that are most relevant to this investigation include the Colorado River <br />mainstem in Garfield and Mesa Counties and its headwater tributaries located in Grand, <br />Summit, and Eagle Counties. <br /> <br />Water supply sources for the Colorado River headwater counties consist primarily of the <br />Colorado, Fraser and Williams Fork Rivers in Grand County, the Blue River in Summit <br />County, the Eagle River in Eagle County. Access to water supplies from these sources in <br />Grand, Summit and Eagle Counties is limited primarily by the relative seniority of water <br />rights for transbasin diversions, and (during the late summer and winter low-flow <br />months) by the water rights of the Shoshone hydropower plant located downstream in <br />Glenwood Canyon on the Colorado River main stem. For all of the headwater counties, <br />water rights held by the Colorado Water Conservation Board for protection of instream <br />flows are a limiting factor during periods of drought and seasonal low-flows, <br /> <br />Water users in Garfield and Mesa Counties have access to water supplies from the <br />Colorado River main stem and its tributaries, while water users in Gunnison, Montrose, <br />Mesa and Delta Counties have ready access to supplies from the Gunnison River and its <br />tributaries. <br /> <br />Growing water demands throughout the West Slope consist primarily of municipal uses. <br />In the headwater counties, water demands for snowmaking and winter domestic use have <br />grown rapidly during recent years resulting in an increased need for local water supply <br />. storage facilities. In both the headwater and main stem counties agricultural lands and <br />water rights are rapidly being converted to urban and municipal uses. <br /> <br />Water management activities and water supply availability are affected by the presence of <br />several endangered fish species in the Colorado River near Grand Junction. A recovery <br />implementation program has been created to address the needs of these species. This <br />program must consider the flow requirements of the endangered species, existing and <br />future in-basin water uses and transbasin diversions. The goal ofthe program is to allow <br />for future water development under Colorado's compact entitlement while recovering the <br />endangered species. Real and perceived trade-offs between these competing uses have <br />resulted in considerable controversy within the program. <br /> <br />Prepared fOT the Colorado Water Conservation Board, Colorado Department of Natural Resources by <br />U"''l..^'''.......... D.."'""....... rn"""1t",..t,, If)n') W...lnllt l;:.fTf>pt ~l1itp ?on Rnlllttf'r ro R010?: <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />There are also several water quality concerns within the basin related to transbasin <br />diversions. Transbasin diversions selectively divert higher quality headwater sources, <br />resulting in higher concentrations of dissolved solids and certain pollutant constituents at <br />lower elevations in the basin. Some transbasin diversions (primarily the CBT project and <br />Denver's Moffat and Roberts collection systems) have also significantly reduced winter <br />season flows in several areas, which has reduced available dilution flows for wastewater <br />treatment facilities in headwater locations. <br /> <br />20 <br />