Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Metropolitan Water Supply Investigation <br /> <br />MWSI Process <br /> <br />Throughout the MWSI process, as TAC members learned more about each others' water <br />supply systems, new ideas for cooperative opportunities emerged which required <br />redirection of study efforts and gathering of additional information. While this approach <br />caused significant delays, it was necessary for maintaining flexibility throughout the <br />MWSI so that work plans could be formulated and modified as necessary in response to <br />the TAC's deliberations. <br /> <br />As the MWSI evolved in response to direction from the T AC during Phase II, the <br />originally anticipated approach was modified to include more analysis and the <br />formulation of conceptual designs in the area of conjunctive use than was originally <br />anticipated. While under the original POS these efforts would have taken place during <br />Phase IV of the MWSI, the overall thrust of the MWSI did not change. However, this <br />shift in the focus resulted in some reduction in the Phase II efforts originally anticipated <br />for the areas of effluent management and systems integration. <br /> <br />The Phase II inventory of available models concluded that the MWSI's analytical <br />approach for yield and operational purposes would be to rely on Denver's Platte and <br />Colorado Simulation Model (P ACSM) as a basic analytical tool and to develop "model <br />extensions" for further MWSI investigations. This decision was based on two basic <br />factors: the importance ofthe operation of Denver's system when considering cooperative <br />water supply options, and Denver's position of openness with respect to availability of <br />P ACSM model data and assumptions. This resulted in a collaborative effort with Denver <br />in the use, review and refinement ofPACSM during the remainder of the MWSI process, <br />Additional models, designed to run as "extensions" ofP ACSM, were developed by the <br />MWSI as parts of specific investigations. A description ofPACSM is provided in <br />Appendix 6. <br /> <br />Efforts under the Phase II ofthe MWSI were substantially completed in August of 1995 <br />with the publication of numerous Phase II task memoranda, four summary reports <br />specific to each conceptual water supply category, and a Draft Phase III POS which was <br />finalized in October of 1995. <br /> <br />2.2.3. Phase III Investigations <br /> <br />The Phase III POS included a mix of work areas designed to advance the treatment of <br />effluent management to a level comparable to the Phase II analysis of conjunctive use <br />options. The PMT felt that more detailed studies in the area of conjunctive use were not <br />necessary with the exception of some additional model runs to evaluate certain <br />conjunctive use scenarios. In addition, Phase III included efforts to increase the level of <br />T AC discussions regarding other systems integration ideas. As with the previous phases <br />of the MWSI, the TAC wanted to retain flexibility so that efforts could be re-directed as <br />needed in response to new information and changing priorities. <br /> <br />In the area of conjunctive use, additional model runs were completed using the model <br />developed in Phase II (with some minor modifications). These model runs were designed <br />to produce analyses in the following areas: <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />Prepared for the Colorado Water Conservation Board, Colorado Department of Natural Resources by <br />Hydrosphere Resource Consultants, 1002 Walnut Street, Suite 200, Boulder, CO 80302 <br />