My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00052
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00052
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2011 11:11:40 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 10:10:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
1998
Title
Layperson's Guide to Groundwater
CWCB Section
Interstate & Federal
Author
California Water Education Foundation
Description
Layperson's Guide to Groundwater
Publications - Doc Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />11/ the /920s, Central Valley <br />fanners were aNe to tap <br />water hundreds of feer <br />helow the swface q{ter the <br />deep-wellturhine pump <br />was im'el1led awl ruml <br />areas received e1a'tricity. <br />The Celllraf Valley remains <br />the state's !lugestllser of <br />groundwater today. <br /> <br />The pumping led to overdraft conditions and as <br />the water table dropped farther still and groundwater <br />became more difficult to recover, thousands of <br />farmers in the San Joaquin Valley - some of fhem <br />having nurtured orchards and vineyards with well <br />water - stood to lose their investments. Delivering <br />water to these growers was the reason for federal <br />investment in the Central Valley Project (CVP), which <br />was designed to capture Sierra runoff for valley <br />farmers whose operations had grown too big for their <br />aquifers. Although CVP water was delivered in the <br />1950s, the overdraft continued and water levels in <br />the San Joaquin Valley fell in some places by as <br />much as 400 feef (see page 11). <br /> <br />In southern California, groundwater pumping helped <br />fa fuel the birth of the modern metropolis. Here, too, <br />over-pumping was a problem, causing, in coastal <br />areas, sea water to be pulled into fresh water wells. <br />In the 1940s when it became clear that demand was <br />exceeding supply in many southern California <br />groundwater basins, officials turned to court adjudi- <br />cations (see page 8) fa determine wafer rights and <br />yields. <br /> <br />In the San Joaquin Valley, groundwater levels began <br />to rise as CVP water was joined in the 1960s by <br /> <br />irrigation water delivered through the State Water <br />Project (SWP). The great resiliency of the Central <br />Valley aquifers was demonstrated in fhe lafe 1970s <br />and again in the 1980s when the recharged under- <br />ground basins helped offset drought-induced suriace <br />water delivery cutbacks. <br /> <br />While natural precipitation and runoff led to some <br />groundwafer recharge, by the 1970s, some of the <br />state's regions already had decades of experience <br />with artificially recharging groundwater. Reservoirs <br />and seepage basins were constructed to coHect and <br />slow the runoff and encourage percolation. <br /> <br />In 1950, California pumped 50 percent of all of <br />the groundwater used in the nation - a statistic that <br />reflects the rapid development of agriculture in a <br />region requiring irrigation, as well as minimal restric- <br />tions on how much water property owners could <br />pump. While surface water development has curbed <br />the demand on aquifers, California still accounts <br />for 20 percent to 25 percent of the nation's ground- <br />water usage. California and Texas - the second <br />largest groundwater-consuming state in the nation <br />- are the only two states without comprehensive, <br />statewide groundwater regulation or permitting <br />of pumping. <br /> <br /> <br />" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.