My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00052
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00052
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2011 11:11:40 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 10:10:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
1998
Title
Layperson's Guide to Groundwater
CWCB Section
Interstate & Federal
Author
California Water Education Foundation
Description
Layperson's Guide to Groundwater
Publications - Doc Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />How CAN THIS PROBLEM BE SOLVED? <br /> <br />A survey of wells in the Metropolitan Water District <br />of Southern California (MWD) service area revealed <br />the pervasiveness of groundwater contamination. <br />The 1994 study concluded that 46 percent of the <br />wells were contaminated with some constituents to <br />the point that the wells exceeded maximum contami- <br />nant levels at least once in a 14-year period. Nitro- <br />gen, vacs, minerais and total dissolved solids, <br />mostly salts, were the most common problems. In <br />general, MWD found the problem to be increasing <br />as pollutants from decades past move into ground- <br />water, and that trend undermines the region's plans <br />to make better use of its groundwater to meet grow- <br />ing demands. <br /> <br />In a portion ot MWD's service area, the San Gabriel <br />Valley, water agencies are cooperating in a compre- <br />hensive approach to solving the problem. Prior to <br />extensive urban development, the basin was home <br />to orchards and dairies. Beginning in World War II, <br />the valley's rural lifestyle and agricultural economy <br />were replaced with defense-related industries, and <br />later, suburbs. Intense demands on the valley's <br />groundwater led to a court adjudication. <br /> <br />In the 1 970s, water managers detected nitrate in the <br />groundwater. Today an estimated one-third of the <br />basin's groundwater has nitrate concentrations <br />exceeding drinking water standards. Much of the <br />nitrate is still migrating from the soil into the ground- <br />water. In 1979, water managers detected vacs in <br />the groundwater. By 1980, 89 out of 300 wells were <br />shut down because of vacs. <br /> <br />The San Gabriel Basin Water Quality Authority <br />was formed in 1993 to coordinate the clean-up <br />efforts of a variety of agencies involved in the basin. <br />Nearly $40 million has been spent by EPA to monitor <br />and detect problems and plan the clean up of the <br />groundwater basin. In 1994, EPA issued a plan tor <br />treating groundwater beneath a major portion of the <br />valley, in which the local authority formed a project <br />to clean-up the groundwater and deliver it to MWD <br />customers, using revenue from the water sales to <br />pay for part of the treatment costs. In addition to <br />EPA's efforts. 19 different treatment programs <br />have been started to treat vacs, nitrates and salts. <br />The treatment programs have cost from less than <br />$60 an acre-foot to as much as $820 an acre-foot <br />depending on the pollutant and the treatment <br />process. Authorities believe they have made <br />substantial progress toward controlling the migration <br />ot pollutants and have designed the infrastructure <br /> <br />that will help to reslore the aquifer over the <br />next century. <br /> <br />In some ways, groundwater remediation is a frontier <br />science. Decisions have to be made with incomplete <br />intormation about the hydrology of a basin, the health <br />threats of certain contaminants, and the natural <br />decomposition or path of pollutants in the soil and <br />water. The extraordinarily high costs of clean up <br />technologies have convinced many officials of the <br />economies associated with better wellhead protec- <br />tion efforts and proper demolition of abandoned <br />wells. The SDWA amendments of 1996 require states <br />to develop wellhead protection programs, and EPA <br />officials are among those who believe California <br />needs to do a better job ot keeping pOllutants away <br />from wells and destroying abandoned wells. The state <br />DHS has taken the lead in developing a wellhead <br />protection program. <br /> <br />The potential for urban landscape designs to either <br />assist or prevent nonpoint source pollution from <br />reaching streams and bays, as well as groundwater, <br />is getting more attention. Extensive paved areas <br />concentrate runoff and pollutants, compromising the <br />ability of soils to filter, decompose or capture poten- <br />tial pollutants. More greenbelts, stream buffer zones, <br />and artificial wetlands are among the designs being <br />explored to slow runoff and control pollution. <br /> <br />The improper disposal <br />(~r chemicals in il/exal <br />dump site... sllch as this one <br />contrihute 10 groun(hmter <br />cOJ/laminatioll. <br /> <br /> <br />UO""_ _ ...........< <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.