My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00050
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00050
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2011 11:11:28 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 10:10:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
1997
Title
Layperson's Guide to Water Conservation
CWCB Section
Water Conservation & Drought Planning
Author
California Water Education Foundation
Description
Layperson's Guide to Water Conservation
Publications - Doc Type
Other
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />As with urban areas, the drive for water use efficiency <br />has become institutionalized in agriculture through <br />numerous federal, state and local programs. DWR <br />has developed and expanded its computerized <br />California Irrigation Management Information System <br />(CIMIS) that provides data farmers can use to gauge <br />the amount of water their crops need on a daily basis. <br />CIMIS uses more than 85 automated stations across <br />the state 10 gather weather data used to provide <br />location~specific information on plant water usage <br />(a process known as evapotranspira~ <br />tion). Changes in evapotranspiration <br />rates can be correlated by growers with <br />published crop coetticients to yield <br />estimates of optimal water needs of <br />specific crops for specific geographic <br />areas. <br /> <br />Using CIMIS data, growers of early- <br />season peaches were able to reduce <br />water use by 30 percent, according to a <br />DWR report. A Kings County commer- <br />cial walnut grower reported a $245 per acre increase <br />in profit over a tive-year period atter a CIMIS-based <br />water management plan was adopted. <br /> <br />The campaign to increase agricultural water use <br />etticiency is being waged by both water suppliers <br />and by farmers. In the farming areas in the south~ <br />eastern corner of the state supplied by the Colorado <br />River, the federal government estimates it loses <br />70,000 acre-feet of water per year to leakage in the <br />All-American Canal serving the Imperial and <br />Coachella valleys, and has proposed lining it and <br />other canals. Water districts that supply agricultural <br />users, such as the huge West lands Water District <br />in the San Joaquin Valley, provide educational <br />materials to farmers and cost~sharing programs to <br />enable farmers to implement water efficient irrigation <br />practices. <br /> <br />Farmers say their water use efficiency already <br />is high, but uncertainty about future supplies <br />is motivating moves toward even greater water <br />etticiency. The 1987-1993 drought brought <br />home to farmers the vulnerability of their water <br />supplies. Ongoing debates about the future of the <br />Della and implementation of the CVP Improve- <br />ment Act (CVPIA) heighten their concern. In the <br />face of uncertainty, farmers are looking for ways <br />to protect their investments in land and equip- <br />ment, and one way is by maximizing water use <br />efficiency. <br /> <br />On~farm conserva. <br />tion methods include <br />using more efficient <br />irrigation systems <br />and scheduling irrigation to maximize watering <br />effectiveness. Water experts believe the biggest <br />payoffs most often come from well managed irriga~ <br />tion systems, not necessarily from installing new <br />hardware, however. <br /> <br />AG MOU <br /> <br />Legislation enacted in 1990 (AB 3616) resulled in <br />development of a memorandum of understanding <br />(MOU) by which signatory irrigation districts and <br />water agencies commit to adopt a number of <br />mandatory and conditional "Efficient Water Manage- <br />ment Practices (EWMPs):' These EWMPs are the <br />agricultural analogs of the "Best Management Prac- <br />tices'. (BMPs) designed for urban water suppliers. <br /> <br />The MOU recognizes that individual EWMPs may <br />not be appropriate for all water purveyors. The MOU <br />requires signatory water suppliers to submit water <br />management plans to the Agricultural Water <br />Management Council comprised of one member <br />from each signatory agency. In addifion to the six <br />"universally applicable" EWMPs. there are a dozen <br />"conditionally applicable" EWMPs that may be <br />adopted by signatory agencies on an as~needed <br />basis, subject to cost/benefit analysis. These <br />measures include construction and operation of <br />tailwater reuse systems, automation of canal <br />structures, and installation of water meters to <br /> <br />Iile cOlllpull'ri;:ed <br />California Irrigatiun <br />AfmUlKement II~rorlllati()n <br />System operated by [he <br />5tate lJepartlllel/1 of Hiller <br />Resources uses more thall <br />85 lllttuHlll1ed station'i <br />across the stall' [0 gather <br />\\'earher data farmers can <br />Itse to gauge the amOll1l1 of <br />water their crops Ill'ed 011 <br />a d(lilybasi.'i. <br /> <br /> <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.