My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00048
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00048
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:40:30 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 10:10:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
1992
Title
Systems Integration as a Water Supply Source for the Denver Metropolitan Area
CWCB Section
Water Conservation & Drought Planning
Author
Hydrosphere Resource Consultants
Description
Overview of water supply alternatives and suggestion for process to address future water supply needs of the Denver Metro Area
Publications - Doc Type
Historical
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />DRAFT 8/24/92, Page 7 <br /> <br />A reasonable extrapolation of these figures results in a population of 974,000 by the <br />year 2035. Based upon data from the Regional Water Study these population <br />growth levels would result in overall northern area water supply shortfalls of about <br />27,000 acre-feet in the year 2035. <br /> <br />However, a further consideration is that different cities within the metro area have <br />different goals with regard to population growth and there is a considerable amount <br />of competition between communities for economic development and the population <br />growth associated with that development. Thus, in the evaluation of systems <br />integration and other new water supply options, it is necessary to consider not only <br />the future potential demand of the metro area as a whole but also the growth and <br />development plans of individual communities. <br /> <br />4. Flexibilitv in Future Planninf! -- The inherent risk and uncertainties of water supply <br />planning on the supply side are associated with difficulties in predicting climatic <br />conditions. On the demand side there is equal difficulty in predicting future <br />demands because of uncertainties of population and economic projections, changes <br />in lifestyles and water use habits, and the effectiveness of water conservation <br />measures. Higher than expected population growth in combination with a sev~re <br />drought could result in serious water shortage conditions, while the development of <br />a large water supply project in combination with lower than expected population <br />growth could result in an excessive supply with higher costs for existing consumers. <br /> <br />Thus, in considering systems integration opportunities, it is desirable to have the <br />ability to develop water supply sources incrementally with control over the timing <br />of development to coincide with reasonably foreseeable demands. It is also <br />desirable to be able to move water to different areas of demand to meet local supply <br />shortfalls. <br /> <br />5. Water Ouality Concerns -- Water supply treatment and distribution systems within <br />the Denver Metro Area have been designed to accommodate water from existing <br />high quality sources. In the evaluation of systems integration opportunities water <br />quality requirements must be carefully considered to determine the water quality <br />compatibility of each system. <br /> <br />II. OPTIONS FOR ADDITIONAL WATER SUPPLY <br /> <br />The following summary of water supply options is organized into six categories <br />representing different approaches to the development of new supply or increased efficiency in <br />the use of existing supplies. None of these water supply options can be claimed by this report <br />as new or original ideas; all of them are currently being pursued, to some degree, either by <br />individual metro area suppliers, small groups of suppliers, or as entrepreneurial endeavors by <br />private enterprise. Though many of these options may be achieved in time thought existing <br />efforts, state government involvement and greater cooperation between suppliers could <br />facilitate implementation of more timely solutions to immediate needs and set the stage for <br />addressing the long- term water supply needs of the metro area. <br /> <br />The water supply yield estimates (firm annual yield), as available from other studies, <br />have been included for each source. However, it must be recognized that the potential yield of <br />combinations of several water supply sources may not be equal to the sum of the individual <br />sources. In many cases there are linkages between water supply sources such that the <br />development of one source may diminish or enhance the yield of another source. For example, <br />Two Forks is another way of developing the same water that would be developed by New <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.