Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />DRAFT 8/24/92, Page 5 <br /> <br />construction of major new projects. As new projects become necessary, the sizing <br />and staging of such projects should be emphasized to maximize cost effectiveness. <br /> <br />3. Increase reliabilitv and resiliency -- Other things being equal, water supply systems <br />should be designed with multiple sources of water supply in order to protect against <br />any unexpected and sudden facilities failure in anyone component or against <br />localized drought, which could severely impact one water supply system while <br />leaving adjacent systems unaffected. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />4. DeveloD better drouf!ht resDonse capabilities -- Rational response to drought from a <br />regional perspective should recognize and take advantage of the geographic, <br />economic and physical variability in water supplies and demands. The frequency <br />and severity of droughts should be explored and understood, and the economic and <br />other tradeoffs of enduring occasional reductions in water supply versus building <br />additional water projects to protect against such shortages should be well <br />understood. Water supply systems with geographically different sources of supply <br />should be intertied for insurance against localized droughts. The use of non- <br />tributary groundwater and the temporary and voluntary transfer of agricultural <br />water to higher valued uses should be included. <br /> <br />5. Address critical permittinf! and Dublic interest issues -- Modern realities regarding <br />environmental protection and other public interest issues require that water supply <br />planning be sensitive to the "best alternative" approach with respect to economic, <br />environmental and socioeconomic impacts. This approach must have a strong <br />regional perspective while at the same time being protective of localized areas in the <br />state. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />6. Provide more flexibility to resDond to chanf!inf! needs -- Given their costs, water <br />supply systems should incorporate flexibility in several dimensions. They should <br />be able to shift their points of water delivery to meet unexpected shifts in the <br />location of water demands. They should be expandable in small steps to <br />accommodate uncertain growth patterns in water needs. They must provide internal <br />flexibility to allow individual water users to buy in or out of water supplies both <br />with respect to the amount of yield and firmness of yield. Such a system would <br />maximize the use of the currently developed water resource. <br /> <br />7. Minimize the loss of irrif!ated af!riculture -- Irrigated agriculture remains an <br />important aspect of the State' s economy and resource base. Rational water <br />resources management should seek to minimize conflicts between municipal, <br />environmental and agricultural interests and to create and strengthen mutually <br />beneficial relationships among these water user groups. Thus, concepts that <br />provide for the sharing of water or dry year leases of water from farmers to cities, <br />for example, may be preferable to the permanent transfer and dry up of major <br />acreages. <br /> <br />8. Address critical environmental concerns -- Water supply systems should be <br />developed and operated in such a way as to minimize their effects on environmental <br />and recreational values such as aquatic life, water quality. instream flows and <br />reservoir levels. <br /> <br />Recognizing that the water supply needs and goals of communities within the Metro area <br />differ considerably from one community to another, the following principles provide a rational <br />framework for the evaluation of options for integration of water supply systems from the point <br />of view .of an individual water provider: <br />