Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />DRAFT 8/24/92, Page 18 <br /> <br />Incorporating the water rights, storage and delivery facilities of the Barr Lake Division <br />of the Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation Company, the Burlington Ditch and Reservoir <br />Company and the Henryl ynn Irrigation District (called "the Companies" in the following <br />comments), the Barr Lake Plan could potentially allow the integration of 100,000 AF of <br />average annual diversions and 150,000 AF of storage capacity into the municipal water supply <br />system of the Denver metro area. The Companies form the largest combined irrigation system <br />in the Denver metro area and therefore play an important role in regional water resource <br />management. <br /> <br />Among the aspects which make the Barr Lake Plan significant are the following: <br /> <br />I. The points of diversion of the Companies' water rights are in relatively close <br />proximity to the metro Denver area wastewater treatment plant. <br /> <br />2. The magnitude of the Companies' water rights are great enough to have a significant <br />impact on considerations related to municipal water supply, wastewater treatment <br />and South Platte streamflow issues. <br /> <br />3. The possibility of using the Companies' existing surface and groundwater storage <br />could permit more efficient management of existing water resources owned by <br />municipalities (including trans-mountain water supplies) but not optimally utilized <br />because of the lack of storage facilities in appropriate locations. <br /> <br />4. The location and size of the water rights concerned are such that an improvement of <br />South Platte river water quality in the reach below the Metro Denver Wastewater <br />Treatment Plant might be possible through an effluent exchange arrangement. <br /> <br />5. The location of the Companies' facilities could allow for integrating the stormwater <br />drainage system for the new Denver Airport into a combined water <br />resource/wastewater system which could address both water quality and quantity <br />aspects of airport-related drainage considerations. <br /> <br />6. The proposed plan involves the development of a new wastewater treatment facility <br />which promises to be a cost effective alternative to improvements presently being <br />considered for the Denver Metro Wastewater Treatment Plant. <br /> <br />7. The proposed plan could result in an improvement of the water quality and changed <br />storage practices in Barr Lake and other reservoirs, leading to improved wildlife and <br />fishing habitat and associated improved recreational resources. <br /> <br />Issues to be addressed <br /> <br />There are many aspects of the Barr Lake Plan which require elucidation and careful <br />consideration of consequences and impacts. The Barr Lake Plan document issued by the Third <br />Creek Corporation on July 24, 1992 points out many of the potential benefits, and the points <br />listed above recapitulate them briefly. Some uncertainties and potential impacts associated with <br />the plan are as follows: <br /> <br />1. A previous attempt by Northglenn to develop a municipal/agricultural cooperative <br />exchange and water supply plan ran into difficulties because much of the <br />agricultural water rights ownership changed in such a way as to render the <br />continued supply of water and acceptance of treated municipal wastewater for use <br />on the historically irrigated land problematic. There are certainly ways that this <br />problem could be avoided, but they must be carefully evaluated and dealt with. <br />