Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />DRAFT 8/24/92, Page 12 <br /> <br />2. Dowe Flats Reservoir -- Due to a combination of factors including a declining <br />agricultural economy, the slowing of municipal and industrial growth, construction <br />of the Windy Gap Project, and return flows from transmountain diversions, there is <br />currently a large surplus supply of water in the area served by the Northern <br />Colorado Water Conservancy District. However, there are many institutional and <br />legal barriers to the movement of surplus water from the north into the metro area. <br /> <br />One possibility for removing some of those barriers could be the development of <br />water storage and distribution facilities that would be useful for serving the needs of <br />both metro Denver and the northern front range. The Southwestern Portland <br />Cement Company has proposed the development of a reservoir in conjunction with <br />the mining of limestone deposits in Dowe Flats to the east of Lyons. This facility <br />could provide storage of up to 90,000 acre-feet of water. By virtue of its location, <br />Dowe Flats could regulate water sources from both the Colorado and South Platte <br />basins. Potential west slope sources include Colorado-Big Thompson/Windy Gap <br />diversions, Thornton's Grand River Ditch shares, Denver's Moffat Diversions <br />(including the contemplated Moffat draft of Two Forks), and the AMAX <br />Molybdenum Company's marketable yield from the Williams Fork. Potential east <br />slope sources include storage of flows from the St. Vrain and Little Thompson <br />Rivers and exchanges via the Colorado-Big Thompson system. <br /> <br />3. Clear Creek Reservoir -- The Colorado Water Resources and Power Development <br />Authority has studied the feasibility of reservoir development on Clear Creek. <br />Options identified in this study would produce a firm annual yield of up to 61,000 <br />acre-feet, with a construction cost of $330 million and an annualized cost of $631 <br />per acre-foot. This cost estimate includes $84 million for relocation of Highway 6. <br />Implementation of this project would require the resolution of significant technical, <br />environmental, and legal issues including potential water quality problems, major <br />Clear Creek Water users, and the users of Highway 6 in Clear Creek Canyon. <br /> <br />4. Other Small Reservoirs - There are a number of other reservoir development <br />proposals that are pending or under development including the Castlewood Canyon <br />project proposed by the town of Parker, the Poudre Reservoir proposed by the <br />Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District and the possible enlargement of <br />Eleven Mile Canyon and Antero Reservoirs on the Upper South Platte being <br />considered by the Denver Water Department. We have not investigated the details <br />or status of these options. <br /> <br />Issues to be Addressed <br /> <br />While these options are generally of a smaller scale in terms of size, yield and cost, they <br />all have significant issues which are potential barriers to their implementation. Gross <br />Reservoir enlargement is an attractive alternative in terms of site-specific permitting. The <br />development area is already impacted by the existing facility and there is considerable <br />information available from the Metropolitan Denver Water Supply EIS regarding <br />environmental impacts. The primary issues are those associated with additional depletions of <br />stream flows on the west slope in the Fraser and Williams Fork River Basins. It may be <br />possible to mitigation these impacts through operational changes and/or cooperation with the <br />Northern District. Another issues is the engineering problem of determining the best method <br />of adding additional height to the existing Gross Dam. Use of roller compacted concrete <br />appears to be the least costly method, but its technical feasibility has been determined. Other <br />methods of increasing the size of the dam could significantly increase the cost. <br /> <br />. <br />