Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />California's reliance on Colorado River water is as <br />entrenched today - and perhaps even more so - <br />than any other time in history. Colorado River water <br />serves agricultural. municipal and industrial use, and <br />as needs expand and supplies from northern <br />California face greater regulatory restrictions. <br />southern California water users have sought to use <br />their Colorado supplies more efficiently. <br /> <br />As early as the mid-1870s. settlers in Palo Verde <br />Valley, adjacent to the river. tapped the Colorado as <br />an irrigation source. But not until 1901, under the <br />direction of famed irrigationist George Chaffey and <br />developer Charles Rockwood, did Colorado River <br />water reach the Imperial Valley. <br /> <br />In 1924. Los Angeles applied to divert 1.1 million <br />acre-feet annually from the Colorado River and in <br />1926. San Diego applied to divert 116.000 acre-feet <br />(both applied to the federal government). Los <br />Angeles and other southern California municipali- <br />ties created MWD in 1928 to build an aqueduct and <br />serve as a water wholesaler. In 1931. a $220 million <br />bond issue for the 242-mile long Colorado River <br />Aqueduct was approved and the structure was <br />completed in 1941. II was later expanded to its <br />current capacity: 1.3 million acre-feet per year. <br /> <br />But it is the large. primarily agricultural irrigation <br />districts in the southern California desert that consume <br />the most Colorado River water. The Palo Verde Irri- <br />gation District (PVID). the Yuma Project-Reservation <br />Division(YPRD), Imperial Irrigation District (liD) and <br />Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) are collec- <br />tively entitled up to 3.85 million acre-feet annually. <br /> <br />MWD holds the fourth priority totaling 550.000 acre. <br />feet annually. When sufficient water is available. <br />MWD can use its fifth priority rights totaling 662.000 <br />acre.feet. The sixth priority of 300.000 acre-feet is <br />divided among lands in the Imperial. Coachella and <br />Palo Verde irrigation districts. <br /> <br />At present. liD has been diverting about 3 million <br />acre.feet annually - nearly one-fifth of the Colorado <br />River's dependable annual flow and the single <br />largest allocation of use of the river's water - at <br />Imperial Dam and through the All-American Canal. <br />liD serves an area 25 miles wide, 40 miles long and <br />bounded on the south by Mexico, irrigating roughly <br />500,000 acres per year. <br /> <br />Under a 1989 State Water Resources Control Board <br /> <br /> <br />- <br />. " <br /> <br />decision over liD's water use in which <br />the board accused liD of wasting <br />water. MWD and liD formed a conser- <br />vation/transfer agreement. Under the <br />agreement. MWD would line canals. <br />improve IID's water distribution system <br />and fund on-farm water management <br />improvements in exchange for <br />106.000 acre-feet of conserved <br />Colorado River water annually for at <br />least 35 years. Under a separate agreement, CVWD <br />would be able to claim 50.000 acre-feet of this supply. <br />To date. MWD has spent some $158 million to fund <br />the water conservation program. <br /> <br />./ <br />-~. <br /> <br />~ <br />.- <br />"';' <br /> <br />Other water efficiency measures taken within south- <br />ern California include: lining nearly 50 miles of the <br />Coach ell a Canal to save 132.000 acre.feet of water <br />annually; congressional authorization to line up to <br />30 miles of the All-American Canal and 38 additional <br />miles of the Coachella Canal and $235 million <br />passed in a 1999 California state bond for lining the <br />remainder of the Coachella and AII.American canals: <br />a 1994. agreement between MWD and PVID on a <br />two-year pilot land fallowing program whereby MWD <br />paid farmers $25 million not to grow crops on 20.215 <br />acres of land. in exchange for 186.000 acre. feet of <br />Colorado River water that was stored in Lake Mead <br />but lost in a 1997 flood control release (A similar <br />proposal with PVID was announced in 2001 that <br />could yield up to 111.000 acre-feet of Colorado River <br />water for MWD): and completion of the new. <br />$2 billion. 800.000 acre-feet Diamond Valley <br />Reservoir near Hemet, Calif. <br /> <br />MWD also has been involved with a controversial <br />proposal to bank Colorado River water in aquifers <br />underlying land owned by the private company. Cadiz <br />Inc., a citrus farming operation. Under the proposal, <br />MWD would pay to bank up to 900.000 acre-feet of <br />water from the Colorado River Aqueduct in Cadiz's <br />aquifers. Environmental groups have been opposed <br />to the proposal staling it would negatively impact <br />nearby wildlife areas. <br /> <br />In 1996 and 1997. the secretary of the Interior <br />directed California to develop a plan to reduce its <br />water consumption back to its basic 4.4 million acre- <br />feet apportionment or face the prospect of the federal <br />government imposing a plan to accomplish this. <br />The proposal. known as the "4.4 Plan," is currently <br />in the final stages of preparation before its <br />implementation (see page 21). <br /> <br />Traveling "wit/reds of <br />miles through a bartl'" <br />desert, the Colorado Ri~.er <br />Aqueduct pro\"ides <br />California lI.illt millions <br />of gallo1ls of H.are!: <br /> <br />19 <br />