Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Nevada in 1996. the other Upper Basin states <br />vehemently opposed the suggestion citing violation <br />of the Law of the River. However, in 2000, the Upper <br />Basin states did come to agreement with California <br />on the Interim Surplus Guidelines, an integral part <br />of the plan to get California to reduce its <br />overuse of the Colorado River. <br /> <br /> <br />Another dilemma involves balancing <br />Upper Basin water and power needs with <br />environmental water demands for endan. <br />gared species - the perennial ~water for <br />fish or water for people" debate. Four <br />native fish - the Colorado pikeminnow, <br />razorback sucker. bony tail chub and <br />humpback chub - are listed as endan. <br />gered under the ESA. If more water and <br />instream flows that mimic the natural <br />hydrograph are demanded for biological <br />needs. the power generated by hydro. <br />electric dams along the river may be <br />devalued. Dam rsoparation is occurring at <br />both Glen Canyon Dam along the <br />mainstem and Flaming Gorge Dam on the <br />Green River. <br /> <br />In 1984. the Upper Basin began develop- <br />ing a recovery program for the lour <br />endangered fish. The Upper Colorado <br />Endangered Fish Recovery Implementation Program <br />was initiated with a cooperative agreement signed <br />by the secretary of the Interior, the governors of the <br />states of Colorado, Utah and Wyoming and the ad- <br />ministrator of the Western Area Power Administration <br />(a branch of the Department of Energy). Under the <br />agreement, the recovery program will continue for <br />15 years and is scheduled for completion or exten- <br />sion at the end of 2003. A similar program was ne. <br />gotiated for the San Juan River Basin. The San Juan <br />Basin Recovery Implementation Program is esti- <br />mated for completion in 2007 (see page 23). Both <br />programs intend to allow for water and power <br />development to proceed in compliance with the ESA. <br /> <br />Utah's Flaming Gorge <br />/Jam is used primarily for <br />power gel/eration and <br />irrigatiol1purposes. <br /> <br />The Upper Basin generates about 9.3 million <br />megawatt hours of electricity every year. Most of the <br />power - 7.3 million megawatt hours - comes from <br />the eight turbines at Glen Canyon Dam. But peak <br />power generation - highly effective in supplying <br />electricity as needed - can adversely affect fish <br />populations. Fish habitats have been negatively <br />impacted because of fluctuating dam releases to <br />meet the hourly demand for power. Conversely, If <br />stream flows are decreased when power is <br />demanded. consumers (and the states) will be <br />subject to higher power prices. <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />After more than a decade of research, criteria <br />have been adopted (under the 1992 Grand <br />Canyon Protection Act) to regulate daily flows <br />through Glen Canyon Dam. located near Page. <br />Arizona The Glen Canyon Dam Environmental <br />Impact Statement concluded that three decades <br />of fluctuating releases (load following) have <br />caused detriment to the environment below the <br />dam in the Glen Canyon National Recreation <br />Area and Grand Canyon National Park. Efforts <br />are under way to mitigate these negative effects <br />by limiting the daily fluctuations in powerplant <br />releases. <br /> <br /> <br />In summer 2000, an already below-normal water <br />year on the system, the Bureau conducted <br />low-flow releases from Glen Canyon Dam in order <br />to gather information on flow impacts to water <br />temperature, sediment deposition, vegetation and <br />both native and non-native fish species. The tests <br />were the converse of those conducted by the Bureau <br />during the spring of 1996 when an experimental flood <br />(releases of water significantly in excess of <br />powerplant capacity) was created through the Grand <br />Canyon to redistribute sediment deposition along <br />and within the river channel; prevent long-term <br />beach degradation; scour non-native streamside <br />vegetation; restore native fish habitats; protect <br />cultural resources, including archeological sites; and <br />provide beaches for Colorado River raflers (see page <br />23). The criteria provide for similar in-stream flow <br />experiments as needed and when hydrologic <br />conditions permit. <br /> <br />WVOMING <br /> <br />The towering mountains of Wyoming have earned it <br />the title of a headwaters state. Almost 2 million acre. <br />feet of water, produced solely within the Colorado <br />River drainage area of the state and primarily by <br />melting snow, pass out of Wyoming's boundaries <br />every year to the Colorado River. In 1890. Wyoming <br />became the first state in the union to assert state <br />ownership of water and establish the doctrine of prior <br />appropriation as the basis for Wyoming water law. <br /> <br />Wyoming uses approximately 500.000 acre.feet of <br />Colorado River water annually (it is entitled to <br />approximately 1 million acre-feet - 14 percent - <br />annually), almost all of which is produced within the <br />state. The Wind River Mountain Range. in the south- <br />west corner 01 the state, houses the largest number <br />of glaciers in the Rocky Mountains. Runoff from these <br />glaciers feed the Green River. the longest and largest <br />tributary of the Colorado River. <br />