My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00046
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00046
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2011 10:11:26 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 10:09:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
2001
Title
Layprson's Guide to the Colorado River
CWCB Section
Interstate & Federal
Author
California Water Education Foundation
Description
Layprson's Guide to the Colorado River
Publications - Doc Type
Photos
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Negotiations <br /> <br />Since the Gold Rush. the tradition of prior appro- <br />priation, or ~first in time, first in right," has dominated <br />Western water law. Those who developed the <br />Colorado firsf would stand to benefit for years to <br />come. It is interesting to note that the Mormons may <br />have been the first western seWers to develop use <br />of the Colorado River system and. consequently. <br />preceded any development of the Colorado by <br />California. But it was California's aggressive rush to <br />appropriate Colorado River <br />water for Imperial Valley <br />farmland and urban davel. <br />opment on the southern <br />California coast that first <br />worried the other basin <br />states. If California estab- <br />lished priority rights by <br />using large amounts of the <br />Colorado's flow, other <br />states might be forced to <br />leave enough water in the <br />river to satisfy those rights. <br /> <br /> <br />Initially. California farmers <br />irrigated the Imperial Valley <br />using a canal that ran partly <br />through Mexico. The Ameri- <br />cans could use the canal by <br />giving the Mexicans half the <br />water. But Mexico's control over the water supply <br />worried the Americans, who wanted to build a canal <br />from the Colorado that was entirely within the United <br />States - an "All-American" canal. <br /> <br />Lee:'j' Ferry is Ihe diriding <br />point lH'lWeell the Upper <br />and Lmrer Basins. <br /> <br />A series of events in the early 1900s led to subse- <br />quent and significant Colorado River development: <br /> <br />. The U.S. Reclamation Service (renamed the <br />Bureau of Reclamation in 1912) was established <br />in 1902 with the passage of the Reclamation Act. <br />which initiated the federal reclamation movement <br />to develop regional water supplies for farming, <br />flood control and hydropower. Eventually, a <br />comprehensive plan to develop dams and reser- <br />voirs on the Colorado evolved by 1928. <br /> <br />In 1905, the headgates of the Imperial Valley <br />canal were breached by flood waters from the <br />Gila River. All of the Colorado poured uncontrolled <br />into the valley for 18 months. destroying homes <br />and thousands of farm acreage and flooding a <br />natural depression known as the Salton Sink, <br />creating today's Salton Sea. The flood <br />intensified the push for the All-American Canal; <br />the Mexican Revolution of 1910 provided further <br />impetus, <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />Several years later, Los Angeles sought a power <br />supply for its growing population. and the potential <br />for hydroelectric power development made the <br />city a strong proponent of a proposed large dam <br />on the lower Colorado River. <br /> <br /> <br />In 1920. a seven-state compact was proposed. The <br />timing was excellent: California wanted a dam to <br />ensure a steady supply of water and flood control, <br />and the other basin states were afraid the project <br />would be approved because of the Californian's <br />strong arguments for flood control and hence. <br />wanted to protect their interests. <br /> <br />In 1922, negotiations on an interstate compact began <br />in earnest. Despite enormous controversy, represen- <br />tatives of the seven states reached a monumental <br />agreement to divide the watershed into an Upper <br />and Lower Basin. Never before in U.S. history had <br />such a compromise between states been achieved. <br />The Upper Basin was "apportioned" 7.5 million acre- <br />leet of beneficial consumptive use annually while the <br />Lower Basin received 7.5 million acre.feet. plus the <br />right to increase beneficial consumptive use by 1 <br />million acre-feet per year. However. the Upper Basin <br />states are required to send to the Lower Basin states <br />75 million acre-feet of water over each successive <br />1 O-year period. <br /> <br />Despite Arizona's refusal to ratify the compact, a six- <br />state compact was endorsed by the federal <br />government and became effective in 1929 through <br />the Boulder Canyon Project Act. Arizona legislators <br />were divided over the compact, but in general, the <br />state did not think the compact was fair because it <br />did not allocate water to each of the states. (Arizona <br />was concerned over state rights to tributaries - <br />namely the Gila River - which were not addressed <br />in the Compact.) <br /> <br />The Upper Basin states agreed to support the <br />authorization of Hoover Dam and the All-American <br />Canal only if California would agree to limit its use <br />of Colorado River water. The Boulder Canyon Project <br />Act set the basis for restricting California's use to <br />4.4 million acre-feet and no more than half of any <br />surplus water - still the largest block of the water for <br />any basin state, however - and required, before <br />he dam could be built. that the state buy all the <br />electricity that would be generated from the dam. <br />California's Legislature passed the "California <br />Limitation Act'. in March 1929 which limited <br />California's apportionment at 4.4 million acre-feet <br />plus one-half of any surplus water. <br /> <br />Before California was allowed to receive water under <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.