My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00042
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00042
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2009 11:40:19 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 10:09:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
1994
Title
Using Water Banks to Promote More Flexible Water Use - Final Project Report USGS, Award 1434-92-2253
CWCB Section
Water Conservation & Drought Planning
Author
MacDonnell, Howe, Miller, Rice, Bates
Description
Report about water banks -- conceptual analysis of the designs, 3rd party effects, etc.
Publications - Doc Type
Brochure
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
272
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />other water rights. Increasingly there also are protections for other values of water, so- <br />called third party interests, in the change of water right process. <br />Perhaps because quantities of water are not simply available for purchase at some <br />known market at the time and place of need there is a tendency to hold onto water use <br />entitlements (and to divert the water because of the "use it or lose it" aspect of prior <br />appropriation law). Similarly, for those foreseeing increased water demands in the <br />future there is a tendency to acquire water rights in advance of the need to assure the <br />availability of the water. In an arid environment, water is opportunity: those who control <br />the resource control the opportunities. In such a setting there is an understandable <br />desire to obtain and hold onto that control. <br />Water marketing through the permanent transfer of water rights serves at least <br />some of the need for more flCXlbility in the use of western water. But there are some <br />serious limitations associated with this single approach. Given the transaction costs <br />mentioned above, transfers of water rights for use in a different location often involve a <br />large quantity of water. TypicaI1y this means that a major share of the water use <br />entitlements to the water supply for an irrigation area are purchased, with the irrigated <br />lands taken permanently out of production. The adverse local economic effects of such <br />large-scale transfers can be substantial, prompting increased resistance to permanent <br />water transfers in some instances. The choice facing the irrigator in a system from which <br />water rights are being purchased is, in most cases, either to sell and go completely out of <br />fanning or not to sell and to attempt to stay in agriculture.- There are no other real <br />alternatives. The choice facing the water purchaser often is to purchase large blocks of <br />water rights (perhaps including the lands on which they are used) to justify the <br />transaction costs or to attempt to develop new supplies of either surface or ground water. <br />More and better choices are needed, both for buyers and sellers! <br />Water banks are emerging as one important way in which greater flCXlbility can be <br />developed in the water allocation systems of the West. This general mechanism, which <br /> <br />"This point is developed at greater length in Teresa A. Rk:c and Lawrence J. MacDonnell, <br />"Agricultural to Urban Water Transfers: An Assessment of the Issues and Options," Nalurill Resources <br />Law Center (1993). <br /> <br />1-3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.