Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />other water rights. Increasingly there also are protections for other values of water, so- <br />called third party interests, in the change of water right process. <br />Perhaps because quantities of water are not simply available for purchase at some <br />known market at the time and place of need there is a tendency to hold onto water use <br />entitlements (and to divert the water because of the "use it or lose it" aspect of prior <br />appropriation law). Similarly, for those foreseeing increased water demands in the <br />future there is a tendency to acquire water rights in advance of the need to assure the <br />availability of the water. In an arid environment, water is opportunity: those who control <br />the resource control the opportunities. In such a setting there is an understandable <br />desire to obtain and hold onto that control. <br />Water marketing through the permanent transfer of water rights serves at least <br />some of the need for more flCXlbility in the use of western water. But there are some <br />serious limitations associated with this single approach. Given the transaction costs <br />mentioned above, transfers of water rights for use in a different location often involve a <br />large quantity of water. TypicaI1y this means that a major share of the water use <br />entitlements to the water supply for an irrigation area are purchased, with the irrigated <br />lands taken permanently out of production. The adverse local economic effects of such <br />large-scale transfers can be substantial, prompting increased resistance to permanent <br />water transfers in some instances. The choice facing the irrigator in a system from which <br />water rights are being purchased is, in most cases, either to sell and go completely out of <br />fanning or not to sell and to attempt to stay in agriculture.- There are no other real <br />alternatives. The choice facing the water purchaser often is to purchase large blocks of <br />water rights (perhaps including the lands on which they are used) to justify the <br />transaction costs or to attempt to develop new supplies of either surface or ground water. <br />More and better choices are needed, both for buyers and sellers! <br />Water banks are emerging as one important way in which greater flCXlbility can be <br />developed in the water allocation systems of the West. This general mechanism, which <br /> <br />"This point is developed at greater length in Teresa A. Rk:c and Lawrence J. MacDonnell, <br />"Agricultural to Urban Water Transfers: An Assessment of the Issues and Options," Nalurill Resources <br />Law Center (1993). <br /> <br />1-3 <br />