Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Chapter 1 <br />WATER BANKS: AN INTRODUCI'ION <br /> <br />A major challenge facing the western United States is the reallocation of a portion <br />of its developed water supplies to new and changing uses. An elaborate and complex <br />legal structure governs the entitlements to the use of the developed water, based largely <br />on the timing by which the water uses were established. By far the largest portion of <br />entitlements is dedicated to irrigation use-roughly 80 percent of all withdrawals and 90 <br />percent of all consumptive uses. In many cases these irrigation uses also hold the highest <br />priority rights to the use of available water. <br />Substantial additional development of the limited water supplies of the West <br />seems unlikely. Instead existing uses are likely to become more efficient, and some water <br />will shift to new uses. Reallocation of water to new uses most often occurs when the <br />land on which water has been used changes its use-for example, from irrigation to <br />residential. Less common but increasingly important are purchases of water rights for <br />USe in different locations. Such transactions generally involve total cessation of the <br />original water-using activity so that as much water as possible can be transferred to the <br />new USe. <br /> <br />Economists long have noted the disparity of monetary value between water used <br />in much of the irrigated agriculture of the West and the value of water in municipal and <br />industrial uses. In a market system, resources are expected to move to uses in which <br />they bring the highest economic return. Many explanations have been offered for the <br />failure of water use to reflect this behavior-perhaps most commonly the existence of <br />"legal impediments" to the marketability of water. <br />Consequently, much attention has focused on the legal structure by which water <br />rights may be changed in use. Previous analysis by the Natural Resources Law Center <br />suggests that while there is considerable infIexJbility in the water allocation structure <br />