Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />of real income g~lin. Th{'fC is a tangihle differcnn' betwccn actual din'l't net \"alue "ithin " <br />n'.l) market tnm~action or U!"l' cin'umSlaOl'(', y('nus the pUrl' pen'e.'plio" of economic \";llue. <br />This is an b~Ul' that suml' rCSOUfn' cconnmist.o; bclic\'C should temper how l'xistCIlCC '-:llm's <br />arc uSl'd. and m.l)- limit their n.'h.'\":'lncc \\ Iu.'n heing contr:lsttu din'clly to usc <br />nIIUl'Shp:lrticularly wltl'n the C\btcnl'c ,-altles eU'l.'cd WiC '-:I!tH' by sl'Hral factor.";. <br /> <br />And third. lIon-usc, "unmarkct measures of existence nllul' arc seldom haoulcd <br />l'qui\":lIcntly hchncn fCSOllfCl' comparisuns. For n:lmplc. while economiC' nlluarion <br />cstimatcs h:lH' hl't'" made to capture lISC :lnu non-uS<' '"allies for many cll\"ironmcntal <br />resources. e,ish'nn' \'ahH's arc seldom. if ('\'Cr. cunsid('n'd for activities such as the <br />irrigation s('ctor; tlu'n' is, no douht, some existence \':llut th~lt society attaches to <br />:lgricultun' ~lJ1d all of its ('II\'ironltu'ntal qmllities. ('ither real or imagined. This can he <br />illustrated hy the tyra's of ('CIHlOmic \'aluation studies th~lt 11:1\(' heen n'ccntly conducted for <br />the Central Valley Projc(.t ~lIld th(' Snake-Columhia Rinr Basin. ;\'un-use ('xistence \':llues <br />h~ln' bcen ('stinwted for fish reSOUrl'es (which also nfain use "alm.'s). hut no attempt is <br />made to c~llculate IlOn-use existence values for the irrigation sector henefits. In effect. the <br />nlluc cstimates used to assess economic trade-offs, in th('S(' situ~ltions. arc not equi\'~llent in <br />slructur"e. <br /> <br />Const.'quently. thc enlllomic tnlde-offs i1l\"oh'ing water n'allocation d('cisions must <br />he weighed with great caution. While decision "Hikers may harhor the hest of intentions. <br />the ('nd result of incompletely reyie\\ed decisions could kid to a real loss of economic <br />h('m'fits. Such a situation is descrihNI hy the follo\\ iog l.:ase study. <br /> <br />7.4.0. A Ca.'1e Stlll~l'. Salmon Flolt' Augmell1atio1J ill tile Snake-Columbia River Drainage. <br /> <br />The salmon flow ~lUgmentation program in thc Sn:lke-Columhia Rin'r drainage <br />pnn'ides an excellent case study to eX:lmine the economic trade-offs hetween irrigated <br />agriculture and cm'ironmental resources, It also highlights prohlems surrounding a <br />('ontro\'Crsial and ill-considered water resource policy and the nced to pro\'ide quantified <br />\'erification Ilf (,'m-ironmcntal henefits from changes to water resources management. <br /> <br />Economic5 Benefit f(eYielU/Page-c~ <br />