Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />regional economic hCl1cfirs \\ hill' cuntrihuting to a 10\\-ellSI fond supply for ronsUllH.'rs. the <br />suhsidy question innlkcs ;1 duuble standard for (]cHlopmcllt rcp:lymcnh h.;tck to the <br />f('llcnll gO\"l'rnmcnt rd:ttin' to olher nll':lSUrCS, and the projects haH' contributed to many <br />new rcen'alian:!1 and l'll\inlllltll'llt:lIl11'ndits. Thl' dt'l):'llc has Ill'en, and ('an continue to he. <br />indccisin without prO\iding much puhlic polic~' resolution. <br /> <br />6.1. <br /> <br />Princip"1 Comme1lt oil/he Irrigation Sub.'ih(r bSIU', <br /> <br />As T:lhlc 5 "null) sUggl'st. thl' irrigation subsidy dehate is somewhat circuhlr in <br />natun'. with rn;lIl~' partil's ;lthall,:ing daims and ('ounter daims. And to some e\tent. it also <br />is unclear \\ hethel' tl1(' dullar amount of tlH' past subsidies merits thl' acrimony it has <br />recl'ind in compari"on to pre"ent-day "uh"idies Olffl'cting cn\ironment:11 n'sourCl' <br />II1lllt:l~enH.'IlI, as \H'II as federall':\IH.'llditurcs for infrastrul'tun' in gencral--thc distribution <br />of benefits and cnsts for an)' one soun'l' uf gO\'ernml'nt npenditurl's is ne\'l'r purc!) <br />equit.lhle :1('ross all sl'gmcnts of society. <br /> <br />But it is most imporlanl and pnlgmalically rde\'ant to address issues affecting the <br />future allocation of wall'r rcsourCl'S and 10 pro\'idl' policy criteri3 that ('(fidently allocate <br />water by acknowlrdging marginal economic \'alues and rconomic tr:.ldc-offs, The <br />fundamental issue today is not thl' value of past decisions :!ffeeting the irrigation projects. <br />as this rern'H'nls sunk costs--a larg(.'ly irrnocahle commitml'nt of capit:!1 resources (public <br />and pri\"ale) :lIld estahlislH.'d financial struclures, What hecomes signifiunt to society <br />today is the economil' nllue of water resource trade-offs and the opportunity costs that arc <br />confronted in making watl'r n'allocation decisions. <br /> <br />Particuhlrly in de.lling with elnironmental resources, actions to reallocate water <br />:lW.I)' from C:\isting: irrigation projccts--or in some cases. to prennt further irrigation <br />denlopment using w:.lter de rind from evolving efficiency practices--c:lIl han negatiH' <br />economic tnlde-uffs. and in sume cases, producing few economic or em"ironmentallH.'nefits. <br />These trade-offs need to he carcfull)' a<.;sesscd prior to making:1 water reallocation decision, <br />The economic criteria ..upporling policy decisions :lIld implt~ll1l'ntation :lctions Ill'cd to <br /> <br />Economic5 Bcncfit RcvicUl/Pagc-Ig <br />