Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />:tnimals :tnd liH'slock production. This amounts to :lhout 70'10. or more, of the tut:ll <br />production valul' for all :lgricultural pruduction in the West. TI14.' IC:'H1ing .agricultural. and <br />irrigated agriculture. production \':t1ue st:ltes an' California. Washington. Tn.ls. and <br />:\chraska (H'C Figun' 1). Till' majur production \'01111(, crops arc fruits ;md ngl'l:lblcs. <br />amounting to :thout SI(. hillion :mnually (see Figurt.. 2). <br /> <br />4.3. <br /> <br />COl1trihlllion\ to Foreig" L~\p()rtl. <br /> <br />U.S. Agriculture and spl'cificall) irrigated agriculture products l'onlributc <br />significantly to inlcrn:uinnal tr;H)c and l'xportS. Tahh.' I summarill's export ,-:tlul's hy the <br />major \\'('Slt'Tn slate cxportus. wilh irrig:lIl'd agriculture l'tlOtrihulions estimafcd <br />scpanltely. \\'ilhin Tahle I, primary irrigatcd agriculture :lOtl products yaluc is n'~' <br />cfln"ilTyatinly cSlimalcd, hl'caUSl' the c\port data SOlJrl'CS do not tlisaggrcgatc :lgricultural <br />products hetwCl'n irrigation and non-irrigation. This 'cry conscn:lti,'c cstimatc suggests <br />an expol't yalul' for irrigated agriculturl' (hat would eHl'l'd S7 billion ,tnllu;llly. A morc <br />:.'CCUnItc cslimatc of irrigatt.'d ;lgricultun' e\port ,'alue would sugge...t :, nllul' greater than <br />510 hillion annually, <br /> <br />4.4. <br /> <br />Agricultural Productiol/ IlIcrt.'use.\- Per Acre. <br /> <br />Thc production pcr acre for irrigated agriculture has inneased drama(ic:llly during <br />the past fcw dl'c:ules. as a rcsull of seyeral technological and farm production innoyatiolls, <br />For almost all ngetahlc and fruit crops. forage crops, and other high-yalue specialty crops, <br />production incrc:lses per :lcn ha"e hCl'n gre;lter than 25(10. For many crops. production <br />increases per acre han ranged bet\\Cl'n 50-tOO'X.. To iIIustrall' din'ctly, Figure 3 displays <br />an a\'enlgl' inercase per :l('rl' for ~ortll\\est states' potato production hetween 1970 and <br />1997. with ;1 projection to the year 2002. The historical increase in potato produclion is <br />about 50%, and rhe future nIte of increase is expected to he :'lhout 2%, per- year (anrage <br />annual nlte of growth), Per acre production incre:lsl's for almost all crops are expected, as <br />continued adnlOces in precision farm management. genetics, chemical application :Iml <br />biological control. :lnd water :lpplicaliun arc introdul'ed. <br /> <br />Economic5 Benefit ReyielU/Page-f/ <br />