Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />CONTENTS <br /> <br />EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br />Overview <br />Pumped Storage Description <br />General Approach <br />Base Case Results <br />Pumped Storage Results <br />Sensitivity Analysis <br />Economic Comparisons <br />Conclusions and Recommendations <br /> <br />1.0 INTRODUCTION <br />1 .1 Overview <br />1.2 Study Phasing <br />1 .3 Study Participants <br />1.3.1 Centel Electric-Colorado <br />1.3.2 City of Colorado Springs <br />1.3.3 Colorado Water Resources and Power Development Authority <br />1.3.4 Platte River Power Authority <br />1 .3.5 Public Service Company of Colorado <br />1.3.6 Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association <br />1.3.7 U.S. Bureau of Reclamation <br />1.3.8 Western Area Power Administration <br />1.4 Pumped Storage Description <br /> <br />2.0 APPROACH <br />2.1 Evaluation Procedure <br />2.2 Data Collection <br />2.2.1 Load Forecasts <br />2.2.2 Generation Resources <br />2.2.3 Economic and Financial Parameters <br />2.3 Base Case <br />2.4 Optimization With Pumped Storage <br />2.5 Sensitivity Analysis <br />2.6 Economics of Pumped Storage <br /> <br />3.0 BASE CASE RESULTS <br />3.1 Overview <br />3.2 Results <br /> <br />4.0 OPTIMIZATION WITH PUMPED STORAGE <br />5.0 SENSITIVITY ANALYSES <br /> <br />PaQe <br /> <br />E-1 <br />E-1 <br />E-2 <br />E-3 <br />E-4 <br />E-5 <br />E-5 <br />E-5 <br />E-6 <br /> <br />1-1 <br />1-1 <br />1-1 <br />1-1 <br />1-3 <br />1-3 <br />1-3 <br />1-3 <br />1-4 <br />1-4 <br />1-4 <br />1-4 <br />1-5 <br /> <br />2-1 <br />2-1 <br />2-4 <br />2-4 <br />2-4 <br />2-6 <br />2-7 <br />2-10 <br />2-11 <br />2-11 <br /> <br />3-1 <br />3-1 <br />3-2 <br /> <br />4-1 <br /> <br />5-1 <br />