Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />1.0 INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />1.1 Overview <br /> <br />The objective of this study is to provide an analytical assessment of the economic <br />potential of pumped storage development in Colorado by conducting a long-term <br />statewide joint planning study. The study reflected existing limitations on transmission <br />interconnections between utilities and investigated the possibilities of increases in <br />power exchanges among Colorado utilities. <br /> <br />The study also provides data to further the goal that both water and power suppliers as <br />well as their associated customers benefit from joint development of water and power <br />resources. Statewide summaries of potential generation expansion plans and the <br />relative economic feasibility of pumped storage are provided in this report to assist the <br />Colorado Water Resources and Power Development Authority (Authority) and other <br />state, federal, and private entities in appraising water resource development proposals <br />with pumped storage components. <br /> <br />1.2 Study Phasing <br /> <br />The study, as initially structured, would have been the first phase of a multiphase effort <br />that might eventually involve the analysis of specific pumped storage projects and <br />larger geographical areas. Based on the results of this initial effort using generic <br />pumped storage parameters, the next logical step in the process would be a detailed <br />comparison of potential Colorado pumped storage projects. If the results of this <br />comparison indicate that there are potential projects that could be developed within <br />the cost range, unit sizes, and time schedule developed from this study, additional <br />evaluations may be warranted. <br /> <br />1.3 Study Participants <br /> <br />The Authority initiated this assessment of the economic potential of pumped storage in <br />Colorado as an outgrowth of its work on other water and hydropower projects. Those <br />efforts (including the St. Vrain, Cache la Poudre, Clear Creek, and Upper Gunnison- <br />Uncompahgre projects) evaluated potential pumped storage facilities using simplified <br />approaches to measure economic attractiveness at a prefeasibility level of detail. In <br />1-1 <br />