My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00032
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00032
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2010 3:55:23 PM
Creation date
9/30/2006 10:07:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
1994
Title
Small Dam Site Reconnaissance Study - Final Report of Findings
CWCB Section
Finance
Author
Harris Water Engineering, Inc.
Description
Identify and evaluate dam sites at a recon leval, dam sites to fill a need for raw water storage
Publications - Doc Type
Tech Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />CHAPTER V <br />FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> <br />The findings and recommendations are separated into (1) dam site <br />recommendations which deal with the sites evaluated during the <br />Study and (2) general findings concerning water storage in the <br />state not related to specific sites. <br /> <br />Dam Site Recommendations <br />The 22 dam sites are broadly categorized by: <br /> <br />Good sites - Sites that have good potential for being <br />implemented and appear to be feasible. These sites do <br />not have any obvious major problems; technically, <br />environmentally, financially, or ownership. <br /> <br />Moderate Sites - Sites that have reasonable potential but <br />have a technical, environmental, financial, or ownership <br />problem which may preclude development, in the near <br />future or ever. Usually, the problem concerns a lack of <br />immediate buyers for the water. <br /> <br />Poor sites - Sites that have little or no chance of being <br />developed because of one or more major problems. <br />Usually, involves an irrigation dam which is beyond the <br />irrigators ability to repay the costs, even with reduced <br />financing terms. <br /> <br />Misc. Sites Sites that need additional study to <br />determine what facilities would be needed. <br /> <br />Each of the sites was placed in a category, based on objective and <br />subjective information. The key question for inclusion in the Good <br />Category is: "Is this dam site ready for immediate implementation?" <br />Implementation broadly means, is the site ready to proceed to the <br />next step in development; in most cases this includes plans and <br />specifications but some sites need additional planning studies. <br /> <br />Identification of the Good Sites was the primary purpose of this <br />Study. There are 9 sites in this category. 3 sites are for <br />irrigation which require some degree of reduced financial terms. <br />The remainder are for municipal water with standard financing <br />terms. Two of the "Moderate Sites", Big Battlement and Granby 1112, <br />could be ready for development in the near future if negotiations <br />to sell water for hydropower move quickly. <br /> <br />Small Dam Site Recon. Study <br /> <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.