My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00032
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00032
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2010 3:55:23 PM
Creation date
9/30/2006 10:07:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
1994
Title
Small Dam Site Reconnaissance Study - Final Report of Findings
CWCB Section
Finance
Author
Harris Water Engineering, Inc.
Description
Identify and evaluate dam sites at a recon leval, dam sites to fill a need for raw water storage
Publications - Doc Type
Tech Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />The dam height is based on the necessary reservoir capacity plus 5 <br />feet of freeboard. Five feet of freeboard is the minimum allowed <br />by the Regulations, but since essentially all of the reservoirs <br />have small surface areas the wave action should not require more <br />than 5 feet. If freeboard is increased at any site, it was to <br />raise the water depth over the spillway to pass the inflow design <br />flood. The maximum crest width is 25 feet as stated in the Rules <br />and Regulations. <br /> <br />The typical upstream slope is 3.0H:l.OV and the downstream slope is <br />2.5H:l.OV, which should provide a good factor of safety unless the <br />soils tests shows the material to have some deficiency. If there <br />is an impervious core with a pervious shell, the impervious core <br />has minimum slopes of 1.OH:l.OV upstream and downstream. <br /> <br />The embankment quantity is estimated by using the best available <br />topography to determine the cross section at the dam centerline; <br />the average end area method is used to estimate the volume. The <br />embankment volume is increased by 30% for compaction to determine <br />the quantity of material to be placed. <br /> <br />If an RCC dam best fits the site, the upstream slope is vertical <br />and the downstream slope is 0.8H:l.OV, as suggested in the <br />publication "Roller Compacted Concrete II". <br /> <br />A cutoff trench is included in all embankments, normally 20 feet <br />wide and 20 feet deep. The trench wall is assumed vertical for <br />quantity estimates but will probably not be vertical in actual <br />construction. <br /> <br />The crest width is determined from the Regulations which state that <br />the crest width shall be the "height divided by 5 plus 10 feet" or <br />25 feet which ever is less. <br /> <br />The outlet pipe size, if not an enlargement, is assumed to be <br />larger than necessary, usually 3 or 4 feet in diameter. The pipe <br />material is suggested to be reinforced concrete or steel. A slide <br />gate is included if not already in place. Most of the dams include <br />a hand wheel to control the gate; a motorized control mechanism is <br />needed on only a few of the dams. <br /> <br />The appropriate inflow design flood to be passed around the dam is <br />based on Bureau of Reclamation criteria for reconnaissance studies. <br />Where the spillway is existing, the current size is assumed to be <br />adequate for an enlargement, unless there is a known safety <br />problem. Most of the reservoirs have very small drainage areas. <br />A concrete cutoff wall is included at each spillway, if not in <br />rock, to maintain the channel shape and the channel crest <br />elevation. <br /> <br />Rip rap was assumed on the face of each dam to be 2 feet thick <br />including the blanket. <br /> <br />Small Dam Site Recon. Study 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.