Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />CHAPTER III <br />SITE INSPECTIONS <br /> <br />Task 2 involved a field inspection of 19 of the 24 sites; the <br />remaining 5 sites either did not require a inspection or HWE had <br />previously been to the site. The 5 sites not visited, were Beaver <br />Creek (late getting information), Sams Knob (couldn't arrange <br />visit), East Lake Creek (couldn't arrange visit), Lilylands <br />(inspected previously), and Backmeadow (wasn't considered). Figure <br />A shows the location of the 24 sites. <br /> <br />The field inspections also involved discussions with the respective <br />entities to assess their need for the water and payment ability. <br /> <br />During the visits, as much data as could be found was copied or <br />arrangements made to acquire the data. Most of the sites had <br />existing data, from the Dam Safety Engineers or owners, because the <br />sites involved an enlargement or reconstruction. <br /> <br />The larger new sites, such as Cactus Park, were studied extensively <br />by the Bureau of Reclamation. Also, the CWCB had been involved in <br />many site studies in the past. Generally, the sites that had been <br />studied extensively in the past and found infeasible, had not <br />changed to the point that they are feasible today. <br /> <br />The data collected and notes taken during the site inspections are <br />summarized in the individual evaluation reports for each site. <br /> <br />Small Dam Site Recon. Study <br /> <br />7 <br />