My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUB00029
CWCB
>
Publications
>
Backfile
>
PUB00029
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2011 11:10:59 AM
Creation date
9/30/2006 10:07:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Publications
Year
1997
Title
Water for Tomorrow An Integrated Water Resource Plan
Author
Denver Water
Description
Water for Tomorrow An Integrated Water Resource Plan
Publications - Doc Type
Water Resource Studies
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />1983. New water treatment plants were brought on line in tandem with reservoirs. The <br />Marston Treatment Plant was built in 1928; Moffat Treatment Plant in 1937; and <br />Foothills Treatment Plant in 1983. Similarly, as water collection and treatment facilities <br />went forward, so did major transmission facilities. Manunoth conduits, some in excess <br />of 100 inches in diameter, now form a backbone distribution system from the treatment <br />plants, a system in which pumping is significantly reduced by virtue of water generally <br />being conveyed to users by gravity. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />In the era before environmental regulation, Denver's planning consisted largely of <br />turning to the next least costly, highest-yielding structural project to meet increased water <br />demand. What succeeding water officials from 1868 to 1968 knew was how to build a <br />system, and how to do it well. The water was available to the system in the spring snow~ <br />melt of May, June, and July. The challenge was to capture it, store it, treat it, and <br />distribute it as a permanent, reliable, high quality supply twelve months a year. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />"Reliability" of supply became an overriding consideration in the Denver system. <br />Denver Water had experienced periodic drought, including a devastating three-year dry <br />period in the 1950s that reduced its reservoir storage to minor pools of water. This mid- <br />1950s' drought became the "drought of record" for the Denver system, with all raw water <br />modeling and dry-year yields taking that period as their point of departure. The 1950s' <br />episode pointed up a principal challenge of water supply planning: to reduce risk of <br />water supply shortages to the lowest feasible level. That challenge was often resolved by <br />engineering and money. By carefully deploying both, Denver built a system of I I <br />storage reservoirs; 4 sizable tunnels through the mountains; 3 treatment plants; 2,500 <br />miles of pipe; 24 pump stations; 18 treated water reservoirs; a state-of-the-art water <br />quality lab; and a successful potable reuse demonstration plant. The Denver system now <br />serves a customer base of almost a million people. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Denver's water system can store 570,000 acre-feet; it annually yields an average of <br />485,000 acre-feet, with a reliable or firm yield of 345,000 acre-feet. The system has a <br />maximum treatment capacity of approximately 700 million gallons per day. Were the <br />need to arise and the dollars be available, that treatment capacity could be expanded to <br />almost one billion gallons a day by doubling the size of the Foothills Plant. Overall, the <br />replacement cost of the collection, storage, treatment, and distribution system has <br />variously been estimated at anywhere between $3 billion and $6 billion; in reality, <br />Denver's system is essentially irreplaceable. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The 1970s and 1980s <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />By the early 1970s, with the enactment of the National Environmental Policy Act <br />(NEPA), the Clean Water Act (CW A), the Forest Land Policy Management Act <br />(FLPMA), the Endangered Species Act (ESA), the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDW A), <br />the Wilderness Act, and the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, Denver Water was faced with a <br />regulatory environment that would forever change its way of doing business. This new <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.